Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov-Dec;29(6):331-340.
doi: 10.1590/1413-785220212906244689.

HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION IN ACETABULAR FRACTURES: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PROPHYLAXIS

Affiliations
Review

HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION IN ACETABULAR FRACTURES: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PROPHYLAXIS

Thiago Sanchez Pires Bueno et al. Acta Ortop Bras. 2021 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Heterotopic ossification is defined as the formation of trabecular bone in soft tissues. It is a common complication after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. However, its prophylaxis and treatment are still controversial. The objective of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of actions to prevent the development of heterotopic ossification after surgical correction of acetabular fractures.

Methods: A systematic review was carried out with research in the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and Cochrane until August 4, 2020, without restrictions on language and year of publication. Only randomized clinical studies carried out in humans without restrictions based on the dosage of treatments, use and duration of prophylaxis were included in this review.

Results: Two studies compared the use of radiotherapy and indomethacin and three compared the use of indomethacin with a placebo or non-indomethacin group. The meta-analysis calculations did not indicate statistical differences between radiotherapy versus indomethacin (RR 1.45, IC 95% 0.97 to 2.17, p = 0,55) and indomethacin versus placebo or not indomethacin (RR 0.85, IC 95% 0.68 to 1.06, p = 0,59). Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to affirm that the use of radiotherapy or indomethacin are effective to prevent the formation of heterotopic ossification after surgery for fractures of the acetabulum. In addition, the number of complications was higher in the indomethacin group when compared to placebo or no intervention. Level of Evidence I, Systematic Review.

Objetivo: A profilaxia e o tratamento da ossificação heterotópica ainda são controversos. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar a efetividade das intervenções para prevenir o desenvolvimento da ossificação heterotópica após a fixação cirúrgica das fraturas do acetábulo.

Métodos: Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática com pesquisa nas bases de dados PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS e Cochrane até 4 de agosto de 2020, sem restrições quanto ao idioma e ano de publicação. Foram incluídos apenas ensaios clínicos randomizados realizados em humanos sem restrições com base na dosagem dos tratamentos, no uso e na duração da profilaxia. Cálculos de metanálise foram realizados utilizando o software Review Manager desenvolvido pela Cochrane.

Resultados: Dois estudos compararam o uso de radioterapia e indometacina e três compararam o uso de indometacina com um grupo placebo ou não indometacina. Os cálculos de metanálise não indicaram diferenças estatísticas entre radioterapia versus indometacina (RR 1.45, IC de 95% 0.97 a 2.17, p = 0,55) e indometacina versus placebo ou não indometacina (RR 0.85, IC de 95% 0.68 a 1.06, p = 0,59).

Conclusão: Não há evidências suficientes para afirmar que a utilização da radioterapia ou da indometacina é efetiva para prevenir a formação da ossificação heterotópica após cirurgias por fraturas do acetábulo. Além disso, o número de complicações foi maior no grupo indometacina quando comparado ao placebo ou à não intervenção. Nível de Evidência I, Revisão Sistemática.

Keywords: Bone Fractures; Clinical Trial; Disease Prevention; Heterotopic; Ossification; Therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no potential conflict of interest related to this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Risk of bias chart
Figure 3
Figure 3. Summary of risk of bias for each trial (the plus sign denotes low risk of bias; the minus sign denotes high risk of bias; the question mark denotes uncertain risk of bias).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Forest plot comparing the risk of heterotopic ossification with radiation therapy and indomethacin.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Forest plot comparing the risk of heterotopic ossification with radiation therapy and indomethacin.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Forest plot comparing complications with the use of indomethacin and placebo.

References

    1. Hoge S, Chauvin BJ. Acetabular fractures. Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544315/ [Internet] - PubMed
    1. Altun G, Saka G, Demir T, Elibol FKE, Polat MO. Precontoured buttress plate vs reconstruction plate for acetabulum posterior wall fractures: a biomechanical study. World J Orthop. 2019;10(5):219–219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kitayama K, Kawakami Y, Fukui T, Oe K, Kuroda R, Niikura TJI. Rescue of ankylosing hip following open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fracture by surgical resection of heterotopic ossification: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;53:107–111. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meyers C, Lisiecki J, Miller S, Levin A, Fayad L, Ding C. Heterotopic ossification: a comprehensive review. JBMR Plus. 2019;3(4):e10172. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milakovic M, Popovic M, Raman S, Tsao M, Lam H, Chow E. Radiotherapy for the prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiother Oncol. 2015;116(1):4–9. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources