Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022;5(3):873-921.
doi: 10.1007/s42247-021-00319-x. Epub 2021 Nov 25.

Biobased composites from agro-industrial wastes and by-products

Affiliations
Review

Biobased composites from agro-industrial wastes and by-products

Florencia Ortega et al. Emergent Mater. 2022.

Abstract

The greater awareness of non-renewable natural resources preservation needs has led to the development of more ecological high-performance polymeric materials with new functionalities. In this regard, biobased composites are considered interesting options, especially those obtained from agro-industrial wastes and by-products. These are low-cost raw materials derived from renewable sources, which are mostly biodegradable and would otherwise typically be discarded. In this review, recent and innovative academic studies on composites obtained from biopolymers, natural fillers and active agents, as well as green-synthesized nanoparticles are presented. An in-depth discussion of biobased composites structures, properties, manufacture, and life-cycle assessment (LCA) is provided along with a wide up-to-date overview of the most recent works in the field with appropriate references. Potential uses of biobased composites from agri-food residues such as active and intelligent food packaging, agricultural inputs, tissue engineering, among others are described, considering that the specific characteristics of these materials should match the proposed application.

Keywords: Agri-food waste; Biodegradable; Biomass; By-products; Composite materials; Sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bioplastics classification according to production process and origin with some examples
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Biopolymer fillers sorting according to three different criteria with some examples
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Organic fillers main sources and some examples for each
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Schematic representation of the processing of biocomposite materials with inorganic fillers as well as some examples of SEM micrographs of different inorganic fillers
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Nanoparticles top-down and bottom-up synthesis
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Active and intelligent food packaging materials properties

References

    1. F. Razza, C. Briani, T. Breton, D. Marazza, Metrics for quantifying the circularity of bioplastics: the case of bio-based and biodegradable mulch films. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 159, 104753 (2020). 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104753
    1. Abraham A, Park H, Choi O, Sang BI. Anaerobic co-digestion of bioplastics as a sustainable mode of waste management with improved energy production – a review. Bioresour Technol. 2021;322:124537. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124537. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blank LM, Narancic T, Mampel J, et al. Biotechnological upcycling of plastic waste and other non-conventional feedstocks in a circular economy. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2020;62:212–219. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.11.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dietrich K, Dumont MJ, Del Rio LF, Orsat V. Producing PHAs in the bioeconomy — towards a sustainable bioplastic. Sustain Prod Consum. 2017;9:58–70. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2016.09.001. - DOI
    1. Civancik-Uslu D, Puig R, Hauschild M, Fullana-i-Palmer P. Life cycle assessment of carrier bags and development of a littering indicator. Sci Total Environ. 2019;685:621–630. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.372. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources