A Computational Framework Examining the Mechanical Behaviour of Bare and Polymer-Covered Self-Expanding Laser-Cut Stents
- PMID: 34850370
- DOI: 10.1007/s13239-021-00597-w
A Computational Framework Examining the Mechanical Behaviour of Bare and Polymer-Covered Self-Expanding Laser-Cut Stents
Abstract
Purpose: Polymer covered stents have demonstrated promising clinical outcomes with improved patency rates compared to traditional bare-metal stents. However, little is known on the mechanical implication of stent covering. This study aims to provide insight into the role of a polymeric cover on the biomechanical performance of self-expanding laser-cut stents through a combined experimental-computational approach.
Methods: Experimental bench top tests were conducted on bare and covered versions of a commercial stent to evaluate the radial, axial and bending response. In parallel, a computational framework with a novel covering strategy was developed that accurately predicts stent mechanical performance. Different stent geometries and polymer materials were also considered to further improve understanding on covered stent mechanics.
Results: Results show that stent covering causes increased initial axial stiffness and up to 60% greater radial resistive force at small crimp diameters as the cover folds and self-contacts. The incorporation of a cover allows stent designs without interconnecting struts, thereby providing improved flexibility without compromising radial force. It was also shown that use of a stiffer PET polymeric covering material caused significant alterations to the radial and axial response, with the initial axial stiffness increasing six-fold and the maximum radial resistive force increasing four-fold compared to a PTFE-PU covered stent.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that stent covering has a substantial effect on the overall stent mechanical performance and highlights the importance of considering the mechanical properties of the combined cover and stent.
Keywords: Covered stent; Finite element analysis (FEA); Nitinol; Stent testing.
© 2021. Biomedical Engineering Society.
References
-
- Alfonso, F., et al. A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS v clinical trial (restenosis intra-stent of bare metal stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-elutin. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 63(14):1378–1386, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.006 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aref-Azar, A., F. Biddlestone, J. N. Hay, and R. N. Haward. The effect of physical ageing on the properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Polymer (Guildf). 24(10):1245–1251, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(83)90053-8 . - DOI
-
- Auricchio, F., M. Conti, M. De Beule, G. De Santis, and B. Verhegghe. Carotid artery stenting simulation: from patient-specific images to finite element analysis. Med. Eng. Phys. 33:281–289, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.10.011 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Auricchio, F., and R. L. Taylor. Shape-memory alloys: modelling and numerical simulations of the finite-strain superelastic behavior. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 143(1–2):175–194, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01147-4 . - DOI
-
- Bajaj, S., R. Parikh, A. Hamdan, and M. Bikkina. Covered-stent treatment of coronary aneurysm after drug-eluting stent placement: case report and literature review. Texas Hear. Inst. J. 37(4):449, 2010.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources