Single-level awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a Mayo Clinic institutional experience and national analysis
- PMID: 34852317
- DOI: 10.3171/2021.9.FOCUS21457
Single-level awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a Mayo Clinic institutional experience and national analysis
Abstract
Objective: Awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a novel technique for performing spinal fusions in patients under conscious sedation. Whether awake TLIF can reduce operative times and decrease the hospital length of stay (LOS) remains to be shown. In this study, the authors sought to assess the differences in clinical outcomes between patients who underwent awake TLIF and those who underwent TLIF under general anesthesia by using institutional experience at the Mayo Clinic and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
Methods: Chart review was performed for a consecutive series of patients who underwent single-level minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-TLIF performed by a single surgeon (K.A.I.) at a single institution. Additionally, the NSQIP database was queried from 2016 to 2019 for patients who underwent awake TLIF as well as propensity score-matched patients who underwent TLIF under general anesthesia.
Results: A total of 20 patients at Mayo Clinic underwent awake single-level MIS-TLIF. The mean operative time was 122 ± 16.68 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 39 ± 30.24 ml. No intraoperative complications were reported. A total of 96 patients who underwent TLIF (24 awake and 72 under general anesthesia) were analyzed from the NSQIP database. The mean LOS was less in the awake cohort (1.4 ± 1.381 days) than the general anesthesia cohort (3 ± 2.274 days) (p = 0.002).
Conclusions: Evidence from the authors' institutional experience and national analysis has demonstrated that awake MIS-TLIF is efficient and can reduce hospital LOS.
Keywords: TLIF; anesthesia; awake; minimally invasive; spine; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E14. doi: 10.3171/2018.12.FOCUS18701. Neurosurg Focus. 2019. PMID: 30933915
-
Spinal Anesthesia for Multilevel Awake Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Single-Center Experience.Oper Neurosurg. 2025 Jun 1;28(6):855-861. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001380. Epub 2024 Sep 27. Oper Neurosurg. 2025. PMID: 39329514
-
Spinal versus general anesthesia for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications on operating room time, pain, and ambulation.Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Dec;51(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/2021.9.FOCUS21265. Neurosurg Focus. 2021. PMID: 34852316
-
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 15;35(26 Suppl):S294-301. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182022ddc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. PMID: 21160393 Review.
-
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 18;22(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04687-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. PMID: 34537023 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Awake Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression Under Local Anesthesia for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in the Elderly: A Feasibility Study with Technique Note.Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Jan 6;19:41-50. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S443792. eCollection 2024. Clin Interv Aging. 2024. PMID: 38204961 Free PMC article.
-
Spinal anesthesia: a safe alternative for high-risk pulmonary patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Apr 6;2025(4):rjaf207. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf207. eCollection 2025 Apr. J Surg Case Rep. 2025. PMID: 40191658 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources