Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;34(2):190-198.
doi: 10.1177/10406387211057859. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

Receptor-binding domain-based immunoassays for serosurveillance differentiate efficiently between SARS-CoV2-exposed and non-exposed farmed mink

Affiliations

Receptor-binding domain-based immunoassays for serosurveillance differentiate efficiently between SARS-CoV2-exposed and non-exposed farmed mink

Jorge Pulido et al. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, infection of farmed mink has become not only an economic issue but also a widespread public health concern. International agencies have advised the use of strict molecular and serosurveillance methods for monitoring the SARS-CoV2 status on mink farms. We developed 2 ELISAs and a duplex protein microarray immunoassay (MI), all in a double-recognition format (DR), to detect SARS-CoV2 antibodies specific to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein and to the full-length nucleoprotein (N) in mink sera. We collected 264 mink serum samples and 126 oropharyngeal samples from 5 Spanish mink farms. In both of the ELISAs and the MI, RBD performed better than N protein for serologic differentiation of mink from SARS-CoV2-positive and -negative farms. Therefore, RBD was the optimal antigenic target for serosurveillance of mink farms.

Keywords: COVID-19; ELISA; RBD; SARS-CoV2; mink; protein microarray; serosurveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Analysis of purified recombinant RBDmFc by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining. Three mg of receptor-binding domain (RBD, 55 kDa; indicated by an arrow), purified from culture supernatant of HEK-293 cells by protein G–based affinity chromatography, were fractionated by 10% SDS-PAGE. Mw = molecular weight markers (in kDa).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cross-reactivity determination by microarray immunoassay between SARS-CoV2–specific Ig and antigens. Specific Ig reactivity (signal intensity) was measured from 2-fold serial printing concentrations of the nucleoprotein (N, 0.2–0.025 mg/mL; on the left of the charts) and receptor-binding domain (RBD, 0.25–0.031 mg/mL; on the right of the charts) by incubating with positive control serum and serial 2-fold dilutions of single antigen detectors. A. Tested N-HRP dilutions: 1:4,000 (light blue), 1:8,000 (orange), 1:16,000 (gray), 1:32,000 (yellow), 1:64,000 (dark blue), 1:128,000 (green). B. Tested RBD-HRP dilutions: 1:250 (light blue), 1:500 (orange), 1:1,000 (gray), 1:2,000 (yellow), 1:4,000 (dark blue), 1:8,000 (green), 1:16,000 (magenta), 1:32,000 (brown).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Best conjugated antigen detector dilutions and antigen printing concentrations for our microarray immunoassay (MI). Serial 2-fold dilutions of detector cocktail obtained with a mixture of nucleoprotein (N)-HRP and receptor-binding domain (RBD)-HRP were used for assaying the positive (on the left in the charts) and the negative control serum (on the right in the charts) with a microarray containing 2-fold serial antigen printing concentrations (0.2–0.025 mg/mL for N; 0.25–0.031 mg/mL for RBD). Specific Ig reactivity (signal intensity) to N and RBD are shown in A and B, respectively; tested detector cocktail dilutions: 1:16,000 N-HRP, 1:1,000 RBD-HRP (orange); 1:32,000 N-HRP, 1:2,000 RBD-HRP (gray); 1:64,000 N-HRP, 1:4,000 RBD-HRP (yellow); 1:128,000 N-HRP, 1:8,000 RBD-HRP (dark blue); 1:256,000 N-HRP, 1:16,000 RBD-HRP (green); 1:512,000 N-HRP, 1:32,000 RBD-HRP (magenta).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) values of the double-recognition format ELISAs (DR-ELISAs) and the microarray immunoassay (MI). Dot plot diagrams in which each dot represents an individual sample: results obtained for DR-ELISA based on A. nucleoprotein (N) and B. receptor-binding domain (RBD), and for MI based on C. N and D. RBD. The horizontal solid lines are the cutoff values in each assay. The x-axes show the exposed and non-exposed classification of samples according to RT-rtPCR and time of sampling (pre or post COVID-19 pandemic outbreak). Positive = exposed mink from farms 1 and 2. Negative = non-exposed mink from farms 3, 4, and 5. The y-axes show the sample:positive (S:P) ratio or signal intensity obtained in the DR-ELISA or the MI, respectively.

References

    1. Andersen KG, et al.. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med 2020;26:450–452. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bastarache JA, et al.. Accuracy and reproducibility of a multiplex immunoassay platform: a validation study. J Immunol Methods 2011;367:33–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boklund A, et al.. SARS-CoV-2 in Danish mink farms: course of the epidemic and a descriptive analysis of the outbreaks in 2020. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:164. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chia WN, et al.. Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020;9:1497–1505. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corman VM, et al.. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill 2020;25:2000045. - PMC - PubMed