Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 1;11(1):23257.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02719-9.

DNA repair inhibitors sensitize cells differently to high and low LET radiation

Affiliations

DNA repair inhibitors sensitize cells differently to high and low LET radiation

Kristina Bannik et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate effects of high LET α-radiation in combination with inhibitors of DDR (DNA-PK and ATM) and to compare the effect with the radiosensitizing effect of low LET X-ray radiation. The various cell lines were irradiated with α-radiation and with X-ray. Clonogenic survival, the formation of micronuclei and cell cycle distribution were studied after combining of radiation with DDR inhibitors. The inhibitors sensitized different cancer cell lines to radiation. DNA-PKi affected survival rates in combination with α-radiation in selected cell lines. The sensitization enhancement ratios were in the range of 1.6-1.85 in cancer cells. ATMi sensitized H460 cells and significantly increased the micronucleus frequency for both radiation qualities. ATMi in combination with α-radiation reduced survival of HEK293. A significantly elicited cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase after co-treatment of ATMi with α-radiation and X-ray. The most prominent treatment effect was observed in the HEK293 by combining α-radiation and inhibitions. ATMi preferentially sensitized cancer cells and normal HEK293 cells to α-radiation. DNA-PKi and ATMi can sensitize cancer cells to X-ray, but the effectiveness was dependent on cancer cells itself. α-radiation reduced proliferation in primary fibroblast without G2/M arrest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared conflicts of interest. Kristina Bannik, Sabrina Jarke, Andreas Sutter, Gerhard Siemeister, Christoph Schatz, Dominik Mumberg, Sabine Zitzmann-Kolbe are/were employees of Bayer AG. Balazs Madas is not an employee of Bayer AG.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reduction of plating efficiency after DDR inhibitor treatment in various cancer cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2
DDR inhibitors sensitized cancer cells to α-radiation. Clonogenic survival for DNA-PKi (A) or ATMi (B). H460, A459, HCT116 and HEK293 cells were treated with 200 nM DNA-PKi and ATMi for 2 h prior to α-radiation, giving doses of 4, 8, 16 Gy, then incubated for 24 h and reseeded for colony formation. Statistical analysis: mean ± SEM, n ≥ 2, 2way ANOVA, Tukey's multiple comparisons test, (*) p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
DDR inhibitors sensitized cancer cells to X-ray radiation. Clonogenic survival after combining DNA-PKi (200 nM) and radiation (A), ATMi (200 nM) and radiation (B). The cells were treated 2 h prior to radiation, then incubated for 24 h and reseeded for colony formation. Statistical analysis: 2way ANOVA, Tukey's multiple comparisons test; (*) p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01, (****) p < 0.0001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
ATM inhibitor increased the formation of micronuclei after X-ray radiation in A549 (A) and in 22Rv1 (B). A549 and 22Rv1 cancer cell lines were treated with 200 nM DNA-PKi or ATMi for 2 h prior to X-ray exposure of 4 and 8 Gy, then were incubated an additional 24 h (48 h for 22Rv1) before analysis; statistical analysis: 2way ANOVA, Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: mean + SD, n = 2, (*) p < 0.05.
Figure 5
Figure 5
DDR inhibitors increased the formation of micronuclei after α-radiation in several cell lines. The micronucleus frequency for H460 cells (A), 22Rv1 (B), H1299 (C) and A549 (D) and HEK293 (E) treated with 200 nM DNA-PKi or ATMi for 2 h prior to α-radiation with activity of 1.3 kBq/cm2 for 2, 4, 8 h, yielding doses of 4, 8 and 16 Gy incubated an additional 24 h (48 h for 22Rv1) before analysis; statistical analysis: 2way ANOVA, Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: mean + SD, n ≥ 2, (*) p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01.
Figure 6
Figure 6
DDR inhibitors selectively affect cell cycle arrest in G2/M after X-ray and alpha radiation in various cell lines. Cell cycle distributions for H460 (A), HEK293 (B) and MRC-5 (C) cells after treatment with 200 nM DNA-PKi M3814 and ATMi ADZ-1390 for 2 h prior to X-ray exposure or alpha radiation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McGale P, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: Meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383:2127–2135. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60488-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferguson LR, et al. Genomic instability in human cancer: Molecular insights and opportunities for therapeutic attack and prevention through diet and nutrition. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2015;35(Suppl):S5–S24. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.03.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gewirtz DA. Growth arrest and cell death in the breast tumor cell in response to ionizing radiation and chemotherapeutic agents which induce DNA damage. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2000;62:223–235. doi: 10.1023/a:1006414422919. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hein AL, Ouellette MM, Yan Y. Radiation-induced signaling pathways that promote cancer cell survival (review) Int. J. Oncol. 2014;45:1813–1819. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2614. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parker C, et al. Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:213–223. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1213755. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms