Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;35(4):1-13.
doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00511-x. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

Diagnostic and therapeutic workup of male infertility: results from a Delphi consensus panel

Affiliations

Diagnostic and therapeutic workup of male infertility: results from a Delphi consensus panel

Luca Boeri et al. Int J Impot Res. 2023 Jun.

Erratum in

Abstract

Male factor infertility (MFI) is a rising issue worldwide with significant socioeconomic costs and negative psychological consequences for the couple. Current guidelines provide recommendations for its diagnosis and treatment but several gaps in the management of MFI are encountered in clinical practice due to the lack of available evidence in published literature. Uncertainty in the management of MFI cases leads to a high degree of variability in therapeutic approaches. We planned a Delphi consensus method to provide insights and help bridge the gaps that separate clinical guidelines from real-world practice. The Advisory Board collected 41 statements on debated topics in the management of MFI, each including multiple items designed as a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire was sent by e-mail to a panel of Italian experts for a first round of voting; members of the panel were later invited to a second round of voting, preceded by discussion of the "hot topics" identified in the first round. At both rounds of the Delphi consensus 68 experts participated to the voting process. After the first round 25 statements were identified as hot topics, and these underwent the second round of voting. Consensus was reached on many, but not all cases, leaving vagueness on few debated topics where decisions are unsupported by clinical studies or driven by controversial results. In conclusion, indications emerging from this large panel of experts may help guide the management of male factor infertility in clinical practice. Studies are needed to address unanswered questions left by cases for whom no consensus was reached.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Infertility definitions and terminology. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/definitions/en/ . Accessed March 28, 2020. n.d.
    1. Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Carvalho J, Corona G, Jones TH, Kadioglu JI, et al. EAU Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2021. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-on-Sexual-and-Repro... n.d.
    1. Schlegel PN, Sigman M, Collura B, De Jonge CJ, Eisenberg ML, Lamb DJ, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part I. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pozzi E, Boeri L, Candela L, Capogrosso P, Cazzaniga W, Fallara G, et al. Infertile couples still undergo assisted reproductive treatments without initial andrological evaluation in the real-life setting: A failure to adhere to guidelines? Andrology 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13071
    1. Fallara G, Cazzaniga W, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Candela L, Pozzi E, et al. Male factor infertility trends throughout the last 10 years: report from a tertiary-referral academic andrology centre. Andrology. 2021;9:610–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12947 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources