Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020;53(1):28-52.
doi: 10.1080/01615440.2019.1664357. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

Reconstruction of Birth Histories for the Study of Fertility in the United States, 1830-1910

J David Hacker  1
Affiliations

Reconstruction of Birth Histories for the Study of Fertility in the United States, 1830-1910

J David Hacker. Hist Methods. 2020.

Abstract

This paper describes a method to reconstruct complete birth histories for women in the 1900 and 1910 U. S. census IPUMS samples. The method is an extension of an earlier method developed by Luther and Cho (1988). The basic method relies on the number of children ever born, number of children surviving, number of children coresident in the household and age-specific fertility rates for the population to probabilistically assign an "age" to deceased and unmatched children. Modifications include the addition of an iterative Poisson regression model to fine-tune age-specific fertility inputs. The potential of complete birth histories for the study of the U.S. fertility transition is illustrated with a few examples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Children ever born by mother’s birth cohort, white women in the United States
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Assumed age-specific fertility schedule for example mother age 48 in the 1900 census with notches for coresident children ages 25, 17, 15, 13, 11 and 5
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Assumed age-specific fertility schedule for example mother age 48 in the 1900 census with notches for coresident children and notch for first imputed child
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Age-specific birth rates for white women with reconstructed birth histories, 1900 and 1910 IPUMS samples.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Age-specific birth rates, white women born 1840–49 currently married to spouses in selected occupations and regions
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Age-specific birth rates, native-born white women born 1840–49 living in the Midwest region and currently married to farmers, by baseline imputation model and iteration number
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Age-specific birth rates, native-born white women born 1840–49 living in New Engand and currently married to men with professional occupation, by baseline imputation model and iteration number
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Birth interval survival curve for currently-married women age 15–68 in the 1900 and 1910 IPUMS samples
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alter G. 2016. Understanding historical and contemporary fertility transitions: A birth interval approach. Paper presented at the seminar “Linking past to present: Long-term perspectives on micro-level demographic processes,: organized by the IUSSP Scientific Panel on Historical Demography, Reitaku University, Kashiwa, Japan, December 9–11.
    1. Alter G. and Hacker JD 2019. The impact of multiple births on fertility and family support in the early 20th-century. Paper presented at the IUSSP International Seminar on Kinship and Reproduction in Past Societies, Minneapolis, Minnesota, August 23, 2019.
    1. Anderton DL and Bean LL 1985. Birth spacing and fertility limitation: A behavioral analysis of a 19th-century frontier population. Demography 22: 169–183. - PubMed
    1. Bengtsson T. and Dribe M. 2006. Deliberate control in a natural fertility population: Southern Sweden, 1766–1864. Demography 43: 727–746. - PubMed
    1. Brass W. 1960. The graduation of fertility distributions by polynomial functions. Population Studies 14: 148–162.

LinkOut - more resources