Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 1;5(4):e10648.
doi: 10.1002/aet2.10648. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Maintaining procedural skills for academic emergency medicine faculty: A needs assessment

Brian Clyne  1 , Hannah Barber Doucet  1 , Linda Brown  1 , Andrew Musits  1 , Elizabeth Jacobs  1 , Christopher Merritt  1 , Rory Merritt  1 , Lauren Allister  1 , Gianna Petrone  1 , Nicholas Musisca  1 , Jessica L Smith  1 , Janette Baird  1 , Michael J Mello  1
Affiliations

Maintaining procedural skills for academic emergency medicine faculty: A needs assessment

Brian Clyne et al. AEM Educ Train. .

Abstract

Background: Emergency physicians require competence performing critical and routine procedures. The clinical practice of emergency medicine (EM) alone may be insufficient for the acquisition and maintenance of skills. Prior studies suggest the presence of trainees in academic settings and/or the low frequency of procedures increase the risk of skills attrition among faculty. We sought to develop a valid needs assessment survey to inform a faculty procedural skills (FPS) maintenance curriculum.

Methods: A Web-based FPS survey was designed to assess experiences performing procedures, self-reported confidence with procedures, and learning preferences for skills maintenance. The survey was administered at a large academic department of EM. Responses were analyzed to determine survey construct validity, faculty attitudes about procedural attrition, and preferred learning methods.

Results: Among EM faculty, confidence was significantly higher for common versus uncommon procedures (p < 0.001). EM faculty respondents reported significantly greater confidence than pediatric EM (PEM) faculty for both common adult procedures (EM mean = 3.7 [±0.3], PEM = 3.0 [±0.4], p < 0.001), and uncommon adult procedures (EM = 2.7 [±0.4], PEM = 2.1 [±0.5], p < 0.001). PEM faculty reported significantly greater confidence with pediatric procedures than EM faculty (PEM mean [±SD] = 3.5 [±0.8], EM = 2.2 [±0.8], p < 0.001). Nearly all faculty (93% [52/56]) agreed that procedural attrition is a concerning problem, and 80% (44/56) had personally experienced it. The most preferred learning methods were task trainers and simulation. Faculty preferred learning environments with faculty peers (91%) over mixed groups with trainees (50%).

Conclusions: Significant differences in procedural skills confidence between common and uncommon procedures, and between EM and PEM faculty, indicate that the FPS survey displayed appropriate construct validity. The finding that skills attrition is prevalent among EM and PEM faculty highlights the need for skill maintenance programming, preferably in peer groups employing task trainers and simulation.

Keywords: curriculum design; faculty development; procedural skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts to disclose.

References

    1. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Emergency Medicine. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. 2020. Accessed March 22, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/110_Emergen...
    1. Emergency Medicine Defined Key Index Procedure Minimums. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. 2017. Accessed March 22, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/EM_Key_Index_P...
    1. Pusic MV, Kessler D, Szyld D, Kalet A, Pecaric M, Boutis K. Experience curves as an organizing framework for deliberate practice in emergency medicine learning. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(12):1476‐1480. - PubMed
    1. Ericsson KA. Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise: a perspective from the expert‐performance approach with deliberate practice. Acad Med. 2015;90(11):1471‐1486. - PubMed
    1. Windred A, Bennett W Jr, Stanush PL, McNelly TL. Factors that influence skill decay and retention: a quantitative review and analysis. Hum Perform. 1998;11(1):57‐101.