Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 17;101(12):adv00621.
doi: 10.2340/actadv.v101.865.

Frequency of Publication of Dermoscopic Images in Inter-observer Studies: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Frequency of Publication of Dermoscopic Images in Inter-observer Studies: A Systematic Review

Sam Polesie et al. Acta Derm Venereol. .

Abstract

Research interest in dermoscopy is increasing, but the complete dermoscopic image sets used in inter-observer studies of skin tumours are not often shared in research publications. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse what proportion of images depicting skin tumours are published in studies investigating inter-observer variations in the assessment of dermoscopic features and/or patterns. Embase, MEDLINE and Scopus databases were screened for eligible studies published from inception to 2 July 2020. For included studies the proportion of lesion images presented in the papers and/or supplements was extracted. A total of 61 studies (53 original studies and 8 shorter reports (i.e. research letters or concise reports)). published in the period 1997 to 2020 were included. These studies combined included 14,124 skin tumours, of which 373 (3%) images were published. This systematic review highlights that the vast majority of images included in dermoscopy research are not published. Data sharing should be a requirement for future studies, and must be enabled and standardized by the dermatology research community and editorial offices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram (5).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of shared images among the 61 included studies. The studies are placed on the timeline when they were first accepted or made available online.

Similar articles

References

    1. Braun RP, Rabinovitz HS, Oliviero M, Kopf AW, Saurat JH. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 52: 109–121. - PubMed
    1. Engasser HC, Warshaw EM. Dermatoscopy use by US dermatologists: a cross-sectional survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63: 412–419, 419 e411–412. - PubMed
    1. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S, Talamini R, Corona R, Sera F, et al. . Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 679–693. - PubMed
    1. Taichman DB, Backus J, Baethge C, Bauchner H, de Leeuw PW, Drazen JM, et al. . Sharing clinical trial data – a proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 384–386. - PubMed
    1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research edn) 2021; 372: n71. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources