Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?
- PMID: 34853881
- DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02432-0
Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?
Abstract
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer has been performed increasingly frequently over the last few years. Robotic systems with articulated devices and tremor filtration allow surgeons to perform such procedures more meticulously than by hand. The feasibility of RAMIE has been demonstrated in several retrospective comparative studies, which showed similar short-term outcomes to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (cMIE). Considering the number of harvested lymph nodes, RAMIE may be superior to cMIE in terms of left upper mediastinal lymph node dissection. However, whether or not the addition of a robotic system to cMIE can help improve perioperative and oncological outcomes remains unclear. Given the lack of established evidence from randomized controlled trials, we must await the results of ongoing studies to reach any meaningful conclusions. Further advancements in robotic platforms, as well as the reduction in medical expenses, will be essential to demonstrate the real benefit of RAMIE.
Keywords: Esophageal cancer; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Robot-assisted esophagectomy.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Short-and middle-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for highly locally advanced esophageal cancer with stage cT3 borderline and cT4b at initial diagnosis.Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):2994-3005. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11666-9. Epub 2025 Mar 21. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40116900
-
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 16;18(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01880-3. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38492067 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study from a high-volume center.J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 22;19(1):414. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02590-0. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40696050 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical robotics for esophageal cancer.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Dec;1434(1):21-26. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13676. Epub 2018 May 9. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018. PMID: 29741233
-
Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1692-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Aug 11. Surgery. 2021. PMID: 34389164
Cited by
-
Artificial intelligence for nuclear medicine in oncology.Ann Nucl Med. 2022 Feb;36(2):123-132. doi: 10.1007/s12149-021-01693-6. Epub 2022 Jan 14. Ann Nucl Med. 2022. PMID: 35028877 Review.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver metastasis from clitoral malignant melanoma: a case report.Surg Case Rep. 2024 Nov 11;10(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s40792-024-02058-7. Surg Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 39527378 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Otsuka K, Murakami M, Goto S, Ariyoshi T, Yamashita T, Saito A, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection without recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;36:2749–57.
-
- Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Kitagawa Y, Baba H, Kimura W, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese Nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260(2):259–66. - PubMed
-
- Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1992;37:7–11. - PubMed
-
- Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1621–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical