Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb;29(7):9393-9407.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17600-5. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

A bibliometric review on carbon accounting in social science during 1997-2020

Affiliations
Review

A bibliometric review on carbon accounting in social science during 1997-2020

Yikun Zheng et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

A social science perspective to carbon accounting is essential for determining the appropriate allocation of reduction responsibility, and thus contributing to addressing the climate crisis. It is crucial to have a comprehensive review of the literature in this field to better understand how relevant research has evolved, and to identify gaps that future studies need to work on. Based on the bibliographic database from the Web of Science (WOS), we identified 897 publications relevant to carbon accounting in the social sciences published between 1997 and 2020. Bibliometric analysis is applied to analyze the trends and features of carbon accounting research in the social sciences. The results show that international trade has spurred considerable scholarly interest in responsibility allocation from a consumption perspective. IO (input-output) analysis that can be used to derive embodied emissions in trade has therefore become the most popular method in this domain. It is also revealed that few publications have addressed quantification of emissions at organizational level. In consideration of the importance of organizations especially corporations in emission reduction, a shift of priority to this particular area is needed for further research. Carbon label and supply chain have emerged as a subject in keywords analysis, but have not been addressed enough either. To achieve carbon neutrality, solely relying on actions at country and organizational level may not be sufficient. Greener consumption behaviors of the public and individuals could play a remarkable role. Thus, it is important to formulate a consistent framework for labeling carbon embodied in products and investigate the drivers of consumers' low-carbon choices.

Keywords: Bibliometric review; Carbon accounting; Input–output analysis; International trade.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Ascui F (2014) A review of carbon accounting in the social and environmental accounting literature: what can it contribute to the debate? Soc Environ Account J 34:6–28 - DOI
    1. Ascui F, Lovell H (2011) As frames collide: making sense of carbon accounting. Account Audit Account J
    1. Bizjak JM, Kalpathy SL, Mihov VT (2019) Performance contingencies in CEO equity awards and debt contracting. Account Rev 94:57–82 - DOI
    1. Booth AL, Aben K, Otter B, Corrigall T, Ray C, Earley S (2020) Carbon management and community-based action learning: a theory to work experience. Action Lear Res Pract 17:62–71 - DOI
    1. Bowen F, Wittneben B (2011) Carbon accounting: Negotiating accuracy, consistency and certainty across organisational fields. Account Audit Account J

LinkOut - more resources