Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug;154(2):284-292.
doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4240_20.

Surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies

Affiliations
Review

Surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies

Pabashi Poddar et al. Indian J Med Res. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Surgery plays an important role in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. Type III radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection using open route is the standard surgical procedure. There is level I evidence against the use of laparoscopic/robotic approach for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Emerging data support the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in carefully selected patients with early-stage disease. In locally advanced cervical cancer patients, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery yields inferior disease-free survival compared to definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Therefore, definitive concurrent chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced disease. Fertility preserving surgery is feasible in highly selected young patients. Role of less-radical surgical procedures in patients' with low-stage disease with good prognostic factors is under evaluation.

Keywords: Early-stage cervical cancer; fertility preservation; minimal invasive surgery; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ovarian preservation; radical surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. Ware RA, van Nagell JR. Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy:Indications, technique, and complications. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010:1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cibula D, Pötter R, Planchamp F, Avall-Lundqvist E, Fischerova D, Haie Meder C, et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28:641–55. - PubMed
    1. Wang YZ, Deng L, Xu HC, Zhang Y, Liang ZQ. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:928. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cao T, Feng Y, Huang Q, Wan T, Liu J. Prognostic and safety roles in laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer:A meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2015;25:990–8. - PMC - PubMed