Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 1;43(2):190-198.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003437.

Augmented Reality Based Transmodiolar Cochlear Implantation

Affiliations

Augmented Reality Based Transmodiolar Cochlear Implantation

Caroline Guigou et al. Otol Neurotol. .

Abstract

Hypothesis: Transmodiolar auditory implantation via the middle ear cavity could be possible using an augmented reality system (ARS).

Background: There is no clear landmark to indicate the cochlear apex or the modiolar axis. The ARS seems to be a promising tool for transmodiolar implantation by combining information from the preprocedure computed tomography scan (CT-scan) images to the real-time video of the surgical field.

Methods: Eight human temporal bone resin models were included (five adults and three children). The procedure started by the identification of the modiolar axis on the preprocedure CT-scan followed by a 3D reconstruction of the images. Information on modiolar location and navigational guidance was supplemented to the reconstructed model, which was then registered with the surgical video using a point-based approach. Relative movements between the phantom and the microscope were tracked using image feature-based motion tracking. Based on the information provided via the ARS, the surgeon implanted the electrode-array inside the modiolus after drilling the helicothrema. Postprocedure CT-scan images were acquired to evaluate the registration error and the implantation accuracy.

Results: The implantation could be conducted in all cases with a 2D registration error of 0.4 ± 0.24 mm. The mean entry point error was 0.6 ± 1.00 mm and the implant angular error 13.5 ± 8.93 degrees (n = 8), compatible with the procedure requirements.

Conclusion: We developed an image-based ARS to identify the extremities and the axis of the cochlear modiolus on intraprocedure videos. The system yielded submillimetric accuracy for implantation and remained stable throughout the experimental study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: R.H. has received funding from Oticon Medical for his current PhD program. For the remaining authors none were declared.

References

    1. Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Rajguru SM, Truy E, Gupta C. The cochlear implant: historical aspects and future prospects. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2012; 295:1967–1980.
    1. Lenarz T. Cochlear implant - state of the art. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 16:Doc04.
    1. Roland PS, Gstö ttner W, Adunka O. Method for hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery. Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 16:93–100.
    1. Esquia Medina GN, Borel S, Nguyen Y, et al. Is electrode-modiolus distance a prognostic factor for hearing performances after cochlear implant surgery? Audiol Neurootol 2013; 18:406–413.
    1. Doyle JH, Doyle JB, Turnbull FM. Electrical stimulation of eighth cranial nerve. Arch Otolaryngol 1964; 80:388–391.