Technical note: Providing proton fields down to the few-MeV level at clinical pencil beam scanning facilities for radiobiological experiments
- PMID: 34855985
- DOI: 10.1002/mp.15388
Technical note: Providing proton fields down to the few-MeV level at clinical pencil beam scanning facilities for radiobiological experiments
Abstract
Purpose: The adequate performance of radiobiological experiments using clinical proton beams typically requires substantial preparations to provide the appropriate setup for specific experiments. Providing radiobiologically interesting low-energy protons is a particular challenge, due to various physical effects that become more pronounced with larger absorber thickness and smaller proton energy. This work demonstrates the generation of decelerated low-energy protons from a clinical proton beam.
Methods: Monte Carlo simulations of proton energy spectra were performed for energy absorbers with varying thicknesses to reduce the energy of the clinical proton beam down to the few-MeV level corresponding to m-ranges. In this way, a setup with an optimum thickness of the absorber with a maximum efficiency of the proton fluence for the provisioning of low-energy protons is supposed to be found. For the specific applications of 2.5-3.3 MeV protons and -particle range equivalent protons, the relative depth dose was measured and simulated together with the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) distribution.
Results: The resulting energy spectra from Monte Carlo simulations indicate an optimal absorber thickness for providing low-energy protons with maximum efficiency of proton fluence at an user-requested energy range for experiments. For instance, providing energies lower than 5 MeV, an energy spectrum with a relative total efficiency of to the initial spectrum was obtained with the optimal setup. The measurements of the depth dose, compared to the Monte Carlo simulations, showed that the dosimetry of low-energy protons works and protons with high LETd down to the range of -particles can be produced.
Conclusions: This work provides a method for generating all clinically and radiobiologically relevant energies - especially down to the few-MeV level - at one clinical facility with pencil beam scanning. Thereby, it enables radiobiological experiments under environmentally uniform conditions.
Keywords:
© 2021 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Monte Carlo simulations of a low energy proton beamline for radiobiological experiments.Acta Oncol. 2017 Jun;56(6):779-786. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1289239. Epub 2017 Feb 22. Acta Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28464743
-
An initial systematic study of the linear energy transfer distributions of a proton beam under a transverse magnetic field.Med Phys. 2022 Mar;49(3):1839-1852. doi: 10.1002/mp.15478. Epub 2022 Feb 11. Med Phys. 2022. PMID: 35124798
-
An analytical dose-averaged LET calculation algorithm considering the off-axis LET enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy.Med Phys. 2018 Jul;45(7):3404-3416. doi: 10.1002/mp.12991. Epub 2018 Jun 19. Med Phys. 2018. PMID: 29788552
-
Antiproton radiotherapy.Radiother Oncol. 2008 Jan;86(1):14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.11.028. Epub 2007 Dec 26. Radiother Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18158194 Review.
-
Beam characterisation studies of the 62 MeV proton therapy beamline at the Clatterbridge Cancer Centre.Phys Med. 2020 Sep;77:108-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 18. Phys Med. 2020. PMID: 32823210 Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Paganetti H, van Luijk P. Biological considerations when comparing proton therapy with photon therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2013;23:77-87.
-
- Behrends C, Haussmann J, Kramer P-H, et al. Model-based comparison of organ at risk protection between VMAT and robustly optimised IMPT plans. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik. 2021;31:5-15.
-
- Goodhead DT, Belli M, Mill AJ, et al. Direct comparison between protons and alpha-particles of the same lET: I. Irradiation methods and inactivation of asynchronous V79, HeLa and C3H 10T½ cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 1992;61:611-624.
-
- Schneider T, Patriarca A, Prezado Y. Improving the dose distributions in minibeam radiation therapy: helium ions vs protons. Med Phys. 2019;46:3640-3648.
-
- Weber U, Kraft G. Comparison of carbon ions versus protons. Cancer J. 2009;15:325-332.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials