Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb:65:102136.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102136. Epub 2021 Nov 29.

Plant transcription factors - being in the right place with the right company

Affiliations
Review

Plant transcription factors - being in the right place with the right company

Lucia Strader et al. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Transcriptional regulation underlies many of the growth and developmental processes that shape plants as well as their adaptation to their environment. Key to transcriptional control are transcription factors, DNA-binding proteins that serve two essential functions: to find the appropriate DNA contact sites in their target genes; and to recruit other proteins to execute transcriptional transactions. In recent years, protein structural, genomic, bioinformatic, and proteomic analyses have led to new insights into how these central functions are regulated. Here, we review new findings relating to plant transcription factor function and to their role in shaping transcription in the context of chromatin.

Keywords: Binding specificity; Chromatin; DNA binding; Pioneer transcription factor; Protein condensation; Transcription.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest Nothing declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Architecture of a transcription factor.
a. Transcription factors consist of multiple modular domains. Structured domains are used for DNA binding and are frequently used for protein interactions. Activation domains, repressive domains, and regions that recruit chromatin remodelers typically reside in intrinsically disordered regions. Protein cartoons created with Illustrate [56] of the LFY DBD (PDB 2VY1) [4], ARF1 DBD (PDB 4LDX) [1], LFY SAM (PDB 4UDE) [57], and ARF7 PB1 (PDB 4NJ7) [58] domains. b. Analysis of percentage of protein comprised of intrinsically disordered regions from Arabidopsis transcription factors and non-transcription factors on a proteome-wide scale using Metapredict [59] reveals enrichment of intrinsically disordered regions in transcription factors.
Figure 2
Figure 2. LFY pioneer transcription factor licenses cell fate reprogramming and subsequent activation of transcription at the APETALA1 locus.
a. The LFY dimer (red shapes) binds it cis motif near the dyad (midpoint) of the nucleosome and triggers local chromatin opening via eviction of histone H1 (green circles) and recruitment of SWI/SNF chromatin remodelers (blue shape). b. Subsequently other transcription factors can access the locus. Their accumulation is either directly activated by LFY (LMI2, yellow) or in response to altered hormone levels and plant age (DELLA proteins plus SQUAMOSA PROTEIN BINDING PROTEINS; purple shape) or photoperiod FLOWERING LOCUS T (together with FD, pink) [23,24,60-63]. c. The assembled transcription factors likely engage with additional chromatin regulators (blue shape) to cooperatively open the AP1 locus. d. Finally, the general transcriptional machinery (white large shape) is recruited. e. Shallow DNA contacts with one face of the DNA by the LFY dimer allow co-binding with the histone octamer. Previously published structure of LFY displayed as a dimer (one of the monomers is semi-transparent) binding the pseudo-palindromic recognition site within AP1 (pdb: 2vy1 [4]). DNA is in grey and semi-transparent except for the half-site bound by the opaque monomer on the left. LFY residues which interact with DNA are in pink and displayed in stick style over the cartoon in helix-tube mode in the rotated view below. Visualization using chimera [64].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Boer DR, Freire-Rios A, van den Berg WAM, Saaki T, Manfield IW, Kepinski S, López-Vidrieo I, Franco-Zorrilla JM, de Vries SC, Solano R, et al.: Structural basis for DNA binding specificity by the auxin-dependent ARF transcription factors. Cell 2014, 156:577–589. - PubMed
    1. Kato H, Mutte SK, Suzuki H, Crespo I, Das S, Radoeva T, Fontana M, Yoshitake Y, Hainiwa E, van den Berg W, et al.: Design principles of a minimal auxin response system. Nat Plants 2020, 6:473–482.

      The authors use the minimal Marchantia auxin response system to derive a simple model for auxin-dependent gene expression, in which auxin-sensitive A- and auxin-insensitive B-class ARFs compete for binding the same target sites in auxin-responsive promoters.

    1. Freire-Rios A, Tanaka K, Crespo I, van der Wijk E, Sizentsova Y, Levitsky V, Lindhoud S, Fontana M, Hohlbein J, Boer DR, et al.: Architecture of DNA elements mediating ARF transcription factor binding and auxin-responsive gene expression in. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020, 117:24557–24566.

      The authors use bioinformatic analysis, coupled to structural biology and Arabidopsis genetics, to demonstrate the requirements for high-affinity DNA binding by ARF transcription factors and rationalize the basis for enrichment of AuxRE repeats in auxin-responsive promoters.

    1. Hamès C, Ptchelkine D, Grimm C, Thevenon E, Moyroud E, Gérard F, Martiel J-L, Benlloch R, Parcy F, Müller CW: Structural basis for LEAFY floral switch function and similarity with helix-turn-helix proteins. EMBO J 2008, 27:2628–2637. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bieluszewski T, Xiao J, Yang Y, Wagner D: PRC2 activity, recruitment, and silencing: a comparative perspective. Trends Plant Sci 2021, 0. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources