Obstetric Complications in Women With Congenital Uterine Anomalies According to the 2013 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy Classification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 34856567
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004627
Obstetric Complications in Women With Congenital Uterine Anomalies According to the 2013 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy Classification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To assess the risk for obstetric complications in women with congenital uterine anomalies and the risk in each main class of uterine anomaly (U2 [septate], U3 [bicorporeal], U4 [hemi-uterus]), based on the 2013 classification by the ESHRE (European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology) and the ESGE (European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy).
Data sources: MEDLINE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until January 2021. The reference list of all included articles and previous systematic reviews were also screened to identify potential additional articles.
Methods of study selection: Comparative and noncomparative studies that investigated the obstetric outcomes of women with any type of known congenital uterine anomaly were considered eligible for inclusion. Screening and eligibility assessment was performed independently by two reviewers.
Tabulation, integration, and results: Forty-seven studies were included. The quality of included comparative studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Odds ratios (ORs), pooled proportions of each obstetric outcome, and 95% CIs were calculated in RevMan and Stata accordingly, using random effects models. Congenital uterine anomalies were associated with increased risk of preterm birth (OR 3.89, 95% CI 3.11-4.88); cervical insufficiency (OR 15.13, 95% CI 11.74-19.50); prelabor rupture of membranes (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.38-4.48); fetal malpresentation (OR 11.11, 95% CI 5.74-21.49); fetal growth restriction (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.88-7.46); placental abruption (OR 5.21, 95% CI 3.34-8.13); placenta previa (OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.87-8.56); placental retention (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.16-2.52); and cesarean birth (OR 4.52, 95% CI 2.19-9.31); when compared with those without anomalies. Pooled estimated risks were 25% for preterm birth, 40% for fetal malpresentation, 64% for cesarean birth, 12% for prelabor rupture of membranes, 15% for fetal growth restriction, 4% for placental abruption, 5% for preeclampsia, 13% for cervical insufficiency, and 2% for placenta previa. Classes U2 (septate), U3 (bicorporeal), and U4 (hemi-uterus) were also associated independently with preterm birth, fetal malpresentation, cesarean birth, and placental abruption.
Conclusion: Congenital uterine anomalies are associated with obstetric complications across all examined ESHRE and ESGE classifications.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021244487.
Copyright © 2021 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2032-44. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det098. Epub 2013 Jun 14. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23771171 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice.Hum Reprod. 2015 Mar;30(3):569-80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu344. Epub 2014 Dec 22. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25534461 Free PMC article.
-
The importance of the 'uterine factor' in recurrent pregnancy loss: a retrospective cohort study on women screened through 3D transvaginal ultrasound.Hum Reprod. 2024 Aug 1;39(8):1645-1655. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae148. Hum Reprod. 2024. PMID: 38964365
-
Definition, prevalence, clinical relevance and treatment of T-shaped uterus: systematic review.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;57(3):366-377. doi: 10.1002/uog.23108. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32898287
-
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes following programmed compared to natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod. 2022 Jun 30;37(7):1619-1641. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac073. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 35553678
Cited by
-
Association between congenital uterine anomalies and placenta accreta spectrum.F S Rep. 2025 Jan 16;6(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2025.01.006. eCollection 2025 Mar. F S Rep. 2025. PMID: 40201106 Free PMC article.
-
Placenta Extending From the Anterior to the Posterior Uterine Wall: A Rare Case of Pregnancy With a Partial Septate Uterus.Cureus. 2025 Jul 16;17(7):e88124. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88124. eCollection 2025 Jul. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40827197 Free PMC article.
-
Shapes of the uterine cavity are different in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Reprod Med Biol. 2023 Feb 23;22(1):e12508. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12508. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2023. PMID: 36845000 Free PMC article.
-
A survey on the frequency of polycystic ovary morphology (PCOM) in infertile patients with septate and arcuate uterine anomalies: a cross-sectional study.Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 27;15(1):7053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91531-w. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40016268 Free PMC article.
-
Metroplasty increases the take-home baby rate by reducing pregnancy loss without changing the chance of conception in women with septate uterus: a retrospective, single-center, observational study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Dec 14;23(1):860. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06191-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 38098016 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, et al. Williams obstetrics, 25th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2018.
-
- Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:761–71. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr028 - DOI
-
- Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:371–82. doi: 10.1002/uog.10056 - DOI
-
- Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;29:665–83. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.006 - DOI
-
- Acien P, Acien MI. The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:693–705. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr021 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials