Effectiveness of cervical pessary in women with arrested preterm labor compared to those with asymptomatic cervical shortening
- PMID: 34856856
- DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1962844
Effectiveness of cervical pessary in women with arrested preterm labor compared to those with asymptomatic cervical shortening
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the effectiveness of cervical pessary is different in women who experienced cervical shortening after a threatened preterm labor episode compared to those with asymptomatic short cervix.
Methods: Retrospective study on singleton pregnancies at risk for preterm delivery (PTD) due to cervical length <25 mm before 28 weeks, who were treated with Arabin cervical pessary. Two groups of patients were compared: those who had contractions causing shortening of the cervix, prior to pessary placement, and those who had asymptomatic cervical shortening. Patients carrying a multiple pregnancy and those who underwent iatrogenic PTD were excluded. The primary outcome was the incidence of PTD at different gestational ages. Secondary outcome was the rate of preterm premature rupture of membrane (pPROM). The groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: 115 patients that met the inclusion criteria were identified. Of these, 91 (79%) had asymptomatic cervical shortening, while 24 (21%) had an episode of threatened preterm labor that resolved, and the pessary was placed after the contractions had stopped. The two groups were similar for maternal characteristics, obstetric history, mean gestational age and length of the cervix at the time of pessary insertion. The median gestational age at delivery was significantly lower (36.4 vs 38.0 weeks, p = .02), and the incidence of PTD significantly higher (58.3% vs 30.8%, OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.68-13.1, p < .01) among women who had arrested preterm labor before the pessary was placed compared to the asymptomatic group, after controlling for confounders. The incidence of PTD before 34 and before 32 weeks was also significantly higher in the symptomatic group (p = .02 and p = .005, respectively). Women with asymptomatic cervical shortening had a longer interval between the placement of the pessary and delivery (median 15 weeks). pPROM occurred with a similar incidence in both groups.
Conclusions: Arabin cervical pessary to prevent preterm delivery seems be less effective in women with a short cervix following an episode of threatened preterm labor than in those with asymptomatic cervical shortening in the second trimester. This finding may help physicians to select patients in which cervical pessary is more likely to be effective, and to improve patient's counseling about this intervention.
Keywords: Cervical pessary; preterm birth; preterm delivery; preterm labor.
Similar articles
-
Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in twin pregnancies with maternal short cervix after an episode of threatened preterm labor: randomised controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):55.e1-55.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.035. Epub 2019 Feb 28. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30826339 Clinical Trial.
-
Cervical pessary to reduce preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation after an episode of preterm labor and a short cervix: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):99.e1-99.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.031. Epub 2018 Apr 25. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29704487 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of a cervical pessary for women who did not deliver 48 h after threatened preterm labor (Assessment of perinatal outcome after specific treatment in early labor: Apostel VI trial).BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 12;16(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0935-7. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27405353 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Pessaries for the treatment of incompetent cervix and premature delivery.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000 Jul;55(7):443-8. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200007000-00023. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000. PMID: 10885649 Review.
-
[Cervical pessary and spontaneous preterm birth].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Dec;45(10):1324-1336. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Nov 9. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016. PMID: 27836378 Review. French.
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous