Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;40(11):853-861.
doi: 10.1016/j.repce.2021.11.003.

Impella support for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center experience

Affiliations
Free article

Impella support for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center experience

Mariana Brandão et al. Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: The use of mechanical circulatory support is increasing in cases of cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI). The Impella® is a percutaneous ventricular assist device that unloads the left ventricle by ejecting blood to the ascending aorta. We report our center's experience with the use of the Impella® device in these two clinical settings.

Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study including all consecutive patients implanted with the Impella® between 2007 and 2019 for CS treatment or prophylactic support of HR-PCI. Data on clinical and safety endpoints were collected and analyzed.

Results: Twenty-two patients were included: 12 were treated for CS and 10 underwent an HR-PCI procedure. In the CS-treated population, the main cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction (five patients); hemolysis was the most frequent device-related complication (63.7%). In-hospital, cumulative 30-day and one-year mortality were 58.3%, 66.6% and 83.3%, respectively. In the HR-PCI group, all patients had multivessel disease (mean baseline SYNTAX I score: 44.1±13.7). In-hospital, 30-day and one-year mortality were 10.0%, 10.0% and 20.0%, respectively. There were no device- or procedure-related deaths in either group.

Conclusion: The short- and long-term results of Impella®-supported HR-PCI were comparable to those in the literature. In the CS group, in-hospital and short-term outcomes were poor, with high mortality and non-negligible complication rates.

Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; Choque cardiogénico; Coronary artery disease; Doença coronária; Impella; Impella®; Intervenção coronária percutânea; Mechanical circulatory support; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Suporte circulatório mecânico.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Impella support - Over- or underused?
    Thiele H. Thiele H. Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Nov;40(11):863-864. doi: 10.1016/j.repce.2021.10.022. Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021. PMID: 34857159 No abstract available.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources