Is the changing landscape of fellowship recruitment during COVID-19 here to stay?

Abstract

Background: The 2020 Pediatric Surgery (PS) fellowship selection process was heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. A review of lessons learned can help determine best practices for the future. The purpose of the study was to analyze the virtual interview experience and assess opportunities to improve the post-pandemic fellowship recruitment process.

Study design: Using a 28-question survey of Program Directors (PDs) of PS fellowships as well as a 44-question survey of applicants to PS fellowships in the US and Canada, we gathered information on the recruitment process during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020). Dichotomous, multiple choice and open-ended questions about the changes in process, platforms used, format, comparison to on-site interviews and overall satisfaction were used for objective and subjective feedback.

Results: A 95% participation rate was recorded for the PD survey. 24 out of 55 programs (44%) changed their on-site interviews to virtual format due to the pandemic. Most PDs described their overall impression of virtual interviews as satisfactory (66%, 16/24) and did not have an impact on the applicant's success in the match (35/54; 65%). About 50% of PDs preferred to have on-site interviews with virtual screening in the future. While the participation rate from applicants was much less (26 of 70), responses confirmed our survey results. Majority preferred on-site interviews (17/26), 6 of which preferred virtual screening followed by on-site interviews.

Conclusion: Components of virtual screening and interviews were found to have benefits financially and from both time and stress perspectives, and thus might survive past the pandemic. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE LEVEL IV: .

Keywords: Applicant selection; COVID-19; Pediatric surgery fellowship; Program director survey; Ranking; Virtual interviews.

Fig. 1

Different platforms and their usage in pediatric surgery programs during COVID-19 based on the 24 PD responses, zoom was the most preferred platform (18/24 or 75.0%, 95% CI 53.3%, 90.2%).

Fig. 2

Overall impression of virtual interview format Nearly half PDs (11/24 or 45.8%; 95% CI: 25.5%, 67.2%) were satisfied with the virtual interview format. Two-thirds (11+5 = 16 or 66.7%) were satisfied or very satisfied. Only 16.7% (4/24) were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied.

Fig. 3

PD Poll on future use of virtual interview format Most respondents chose ‘On-site w/ virtual’ (28/55 or 50.9%; 95% CI: 37.1%, 64.7%) with ‘On-site inter.’ as a close second (22/55 or 40.0%; 95% CI: 27.0%, 54.1%). Only 3.64% (2/55; 95% CI: 0.44%, 12.5%) chose ‘Virtual’ alone.