Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e051958.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051958.

Continuity of care, measurement and association with hospital admission and mortality: a registry-based longitudinal cohort study

Affiliations

Continuity of care, measurement and association with hospital admission and mortality: a registry-based longitudinal cohort study

Øystein Hetlevik et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether continuity of care (COC) with a general practitioner (GP) is associated with mortality and hospital admissions for older patients We argue that the conventional continuity measure may overestimate these associations. To better reflect COC as a GP quality indicator, we present an alternative, service-based measure.

Design: Registry-based, population-level longitudinal cohort study.

Setting: Linked data from Norwegian administrative healthcare registries, including 3989 GPs.

Participants: 757 873 patients aged 60-90 years with ≥2 contacts with a GP during 2016 and 2017.

Main outcome measure: All-cause emergency hospital admissions, emergency admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions, and mortality, in 2018.

Results: We assessed COC using the conventional usual provider of care index (UPCpatient) and an alternative/supplementary index (UPCGP list) based on the COC for all other patients enlisted with the same preferred GP.For both indices, the mean index score was 0.78. Our model controls for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, prior healthcare use and municipality-fixed effects. Overall, UPCGP list shows a much weaker association between COC and the outcomes. For both indices, there is a negative relationship between COC and hospital admissions. A 0.2-point increase in the index score would reduce admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions by 8.1% (CI 7.1% to 9.1%) versus merely 1.9% (0.2% to 3.5%) according to UPCpatient and UPCGP list, respectively. Using UPCGP list, we find that mortality is no longer associated with COC. There was greater evidence for an association between COC and all-cause admissions among patients with low education.

Conclusions: A continuity measure based on each patient's contacts with own preferred GP may overestimate the importance of COC as a feature of the GP practice. An alternative, service-based measure of continuity could be suitable as a quality measure in primary healthcare. Facilitating continuity should be considered a health policy measure to reduce inequalities in health.

Keywords: organisation of health services; primary care; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of usual provider of care indices (n=757 873) based on data from individual patients (left figure: (UPCpatient)) and at general practitioner (GP) practice level (right figure: UPCGP list). Red dotted lines: mean value of each index. UPC, usual provider of care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. United Nations Children’s F, WHO . A vision for primary health care in the 21st century: towards universal health coverage and the sustainable development goals. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.
    1. Pollack CE, Hussey PS, Rudin RS, et al. . Measuring care continuity: a comparison of claims-based methods. Med Care 2016;54:e30. 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saultz JW. Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann Fam Med 2003;1:134–43. 10.1370/afm.23 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uijen AA, Schers HJ, van Weel C. Continuity of care preferably measured from the patients' perspective. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:998–9. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, et al. . Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003;327:1219–21. 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources