Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):e054365.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054365.

POSNOC-POsitive Sentinel NOde: adjuvant therapy alone versus adjuvant therapy plus Clearance or axillary radiotherapy: a randomised controlled trial of axillary treatment in women with early-stage breast cancer who have metastases in one or two sentinel nodes

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

POSNOC-POsitive Sentinel NOde: adjuvant therapy alone versus adjuvant therapy plus Clearance or axillary radiotherapy: a randomised controlled trial of axillary treatment in women with early-stage breast cancer who have metastases in one or two sentinel nodes

Amit Goyal et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: ACOSOG-Z0011(Z11) trial showed that axillary node clearance (ANC) may be omitted in women with ≤2 positive nodes undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) and whole breast radiotherapy (RT). A confirmatory study is needed to clarify the role of axillary treatment in women with ≤2 macrometastases undergoing BCS and groups that were not included in Z11 for example, mastectomy and those with microscopic extranodal invasion. The primary objective of POsitive Sentinel NOde: adjuvant therapy alone versus adjuvant therapy plus Clearance or axillary radiotherapy (POSNOC) is to evaluate whether for women with breast cancer and 1 or 2 macrometastases, adjuvant therapy alone is non-inferior to adjuvant therapy plus axillary treatment, in terms of 5-year axillary recurrence.

Methods and analysis: POSNOC is a pragmatic, multicentre, non-inferiority, international trial with participants randomised in a 1:1 ratio. Women are eligible if they have T1/T2, unifocal or multifocal invasive breast cancer, and 1 or 2 macrometastases at sentinel node biopsy, with or without extranodal extension. In the intervention group women receive adjuvant therapy alone, in the standard care group they receive ANC or axillary RT. In both groups women receive adjuvant therapy, according to local guidelines. This includes systemic therapy and, if indicated, RT to breast or chest wall. The UK Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group manages the in-built radiotherapy quality assurance programme. Primary endpoint is 5-year axillary recurrence. Secondary outcomes are arm morbidity assessed by Lymphoedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire and QuickDASH questionnaires; quality of life and anxiety as assessed with FACT B+4 and State/Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaires, respectively; other oncological outcomes; economic evaluation using EQ-5D-5L. Target sample size is 1900. Primary analysis is per protocol. Recruitment started on 1 August 2014 and as of 9 June 2021, 1866 participants have been randomised.

Ethics and dissemination: Protocol was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee East Midlands-Nottingham 2 (REC reference: 13/EM/0459). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN54765244; NCT0240168Cite Now.

Keywords: adult radiotherapy; breast surgery; breast tumours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: LV was a member of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, Clinical Trials and Evaluation Panel from 2014 to 2018.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial flow chart. ANC, axillary node clearance; ART axillary radiotherapy; FACT B+4, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Breast +4; STAI, State/Trait Anxiety Inventory; LBCQ, Lymphoedema and Breast Cancer Questionnaire; QuickDASH, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire.

References

    1. Buchholz TA, Tucker SL, Erwin J, et al. . Impact of systemic treatment on local control for patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer treated with breast-conservation therapy. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2240–6. 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.8.2240 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mansel RE, MacNeill F, Horgan K, et al. . Results of a national training programme in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Br J Surg 2013;100:654–61. 10.1002/bjs.9058 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khonji NI, Edwards R, Sweetland HM, et al. . Incidence of nodes in completion mastectomy specimens following breast conservation and axillary clearance. Br J Surg 2002;89:1294–5. 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02203.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, et al. . Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg 2010;252:426–32. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f08f32 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azghadi S, Daly M, Mayadev J. Practice patterns of radiation field design for sentinel lymph node-positive early-stage breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2016;16:410–7. 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.05.009 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types