Primary plasma cell leukemia: consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage
- PMID: 34857730
- PMCID: PMC8640034
- DOI: 10.1038/s41408-021-00587-0
Primary plasma cell leukemia: consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage
Abstract
Primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) has a consistently ominous prognosis, even after progress in the last decades. PCL deserves a prompt identification to start the most effective treatment for this ultra-high-risk disease. The aim of this position paper is to revisit the diagnosis of PCL according to the presence of circulating plasma cells in patients otherwise meeting diagnostic criteria of multiple myeloma. We could identify two retrospective series where the question about what number of circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood should be used for defining PCL. The presence of ≥5% circulating plasma cells in patients with MM had a similar adverse prognostic impact as the previously defined PCL. Therefore, PCL should be defined by the presence of 5% or more circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood smears in patients otherwise diagnosed with symptomatic multiple myeloma.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
BP reports honoraria for lectures from and membership on advisory boards with Adaptive, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Celgene, Creative BioLabs, Gilead, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda; unrestricted grants from Celgene, EngMab, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; and consultancy for Bristol-Myers Squibb-Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda. LR reports honoraria from Janssen, BMS-Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, Sanofi, GSK. SZU reports grants and personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Abbvie, grants from BMS, grants and personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from MundiPharma, grants from Pharmacyclics, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from Seattle Genetics, grants and personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Takeda, grants and personal fees from SkylineDX, grants and personal fees from Merck, grants and personal fees from GSK, outside the submitted work. FS reports honoraria from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Schain, SkyliteDX, Takeda; consultancy or advisory board from Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, and unrestricted grants from Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi. SL reports honoraria or consultancy from Sorrento, Janssen, Celularity, Abbvie, GSK, Takeda, Karyopharm, Sanofi, Oncopetide and Caelum Biosciences; research grants from Karyopharm, Sanofi; and holds shares and serves on board of directors for Caelum Biosciences. EMO reports honoraria or consultancy funding from Janssen, BMS, Sanofi, GSK, Oncopeptides, Takeda, Pfizer and Amgen. LG reports consultancy or advisory boards from Takeda, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, and Janssen. GG reports honoraria or consultancy from Fujimoto Pharmaceutical Corporation, Japan. HG reports grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product from Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Dietmar-Hopp-Foundation, Janssen, Johns Hopkins University, Sanofi; research grants from Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Incyte, Molecular Partners, Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD), Sanofi, Mundipharma GmbH, Takeda, Novartis; and consultancy or advisory boards from Adaptive Biotechnology, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda; and honoraria from Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi. SAT reports grants received from Karyopharm, Sanofi Genzyme and Caelum; and honoraria from Karyopharm, Caelum, Sanofi Genzyme, Oncopeptides, and Shattuck Labs. HE reports honoria or consultancy and unrestricted grants from Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Amgen, Novartis, Takeda, Sanofi, GSK. BGMD reports consultancy or advisory boards from Takeda, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, and Janssen. MK reports consultancy from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Seattle Genetics, Takeda; research funding from BMS/Celgene, Janssen; and educational or travel support from BMS/Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda. JSM reports consultancy or advisory boards from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, SecuraBio, and Regeneron. MVM reports honoraria or consultancy from Janssen, BMS-Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Abbvie, GSK, Sanofi, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sea-Gen, Bluebird-bio. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic Implications of Circulating Plasma Cell Percentage in Multiple Myeloma and Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia Defined by New Criteria.Acta Haematol. 2025;148(1):48-57. doi: 10.1159/000538658. Epub 2024 Apr 16. Acta Haematol. 2025. PMID: 38626745 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic impact of circulating plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma: implications for plasma cell leukemia definition.Haematologica. 2017 Jun;102(6):1099-1104. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.158303. Epub 2017 Mar 2. Haematologica. 2017. PMID: 28255016 Free PMC article.
-
[Plasma cell leukemia: new diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives (about five cases)].Pan Afr Med J. 2025 Jan 9;50:19. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2025.50.19.45959. eCollection 2025. Pan Afr Med J. 2025. PMID: 40290326 Free PMC article. French.
-
Plasma cell leukemia: consensus statement on diagnostic requirements, response criteria and treatment recommendations by the International Myeloma Working Group.Leukemia. 2013 Apr;27(4):780-91. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.336. Epub 2012 Nov 21. Leukemia. 2013. PMID: 23288300 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Plasma cell leukemia: from biology to treatment.Eur J Haematol. 2015 Jul;95(1):16-26. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12533. Epub 2015 Mar 16. Eur J Haematol. 2015. PMID: 25778450 Review.
Cited by
-
Genomics of Plasma Cell Leukemia.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 21;14(6):1594. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061594. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35326746 Free PMC article. Review.
-
More than 2% circulating plasma cells as a prognostic biomarker in a large cohort of patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma.Ann Hematol. 2023 Oct;102(10):2943-2945. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05362-8. Epub 2023 Jul 12. Ann Hematol. 2023. PMID: 37434095 No abstract available.
-
A rational approach to functional high-risk myeloma.Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023 Dec 8;2023(1):433-442. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2023000443. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023. PMID: 38066896 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Refining High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Advancements in Genomic, Clinical, and Prognostic Criteria.Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 1;17(1):e2025006. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2025.006. eCollection 2025. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 39830800 Free PMC article. Review.
-
MicroRNA Profiling of Bone Marrow Plasma Extracellular Vesicles in Multiple Myeloma, Extramedullary Disease, and Plasma Cell Leukemia.Hematol Oncol. 2025 Jan;43(1):e70036. doi: 10.1002/hon.70036. Hematol Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39804194 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol. 2003;121:749–57. - PubMed