Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):540-560.
doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1256.

Health sciences librarians' engagement in open science: a scoping review

Dean Giustini  1 , Kevin B Read  2 , Ariel Deardorff  3 , Lisa Federer  4 , Melissa L Rethlefsen  5
Affiliations

Health sciences librarians' engagement in open science: a scoping review

Dean Giustini et al. J Med Libr Assoc. .

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the engagement of health sciences librarians (HSLs) in open science (OS) through the delivery of library services, support, and programs for researchers.

Methods: We performed a scoping review guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and Joanna Briggs' Manual for Scoping Reviews. Our search methods consisted of searching five bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LISTA, and Web of Science Core Collection), reference harvesting, and targeted website and journal searching. To determine study eligibility, we applied predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria and reached consensus when there was disagreement. We extracted data in duplicate and performed qualitative analysis to map key themes.

Results: We included fifty-four studies. Research methods included descriptive or narrative approaches (76%); surveys, questionnaires, and interviews (15%); or mixed methods (9%). We labeled studies with one or more of FOSTER's six OS themes: open access (54%), open data (43%), open science (24%), open education (6%), open source (6%), and citizen science (6%). Key drivers in OS were scientific integrity and transparency, openness as a guiding principle in research, and funder mandates making research publicly accessible.

Conclusions: HSLs play key roles in advancing OS worldwide. Formal studies are needed to assess the impact of HSLs' engagement in OS. HSLs should promote adoption of OS within their research communities and develop strategic plans aligned with institutional partners. HSLs can promote OS by adopting more rigorous and transparent research practices of their own. Future research should examine HSLs' engagement in OS through social justice and equity perspectives.

Keywords: health sciences librarians; health sciences libraries; open science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
HSL-specific OS publications by country
Figure 3
Figure 3
HSL-specific OS publications by year
Figure 4
Figure 4
Key OS themes
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rockhold F, Bromley C, Wagner EK, Buyse M. Open science: the open clinical trials data journey. Clin Trials. 2019;16(5):539–46. - PubMed
    1. Watson M. When will “open science” become simply “science”? Genome Biol. 2015;16(100960660, dxp):101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rahal R-M, Havemann J. Science in crisis. Is open science the solution? MetaArXiv [Preprint]. 2019. May 3. Available from: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/3hb6g/.
    1. Giustini D, Read K, Deardorff A, Federer LM, Rethlefsen ML. Health sciences librarians' support of researchers and engagement in open science: a scoping review (protocol). OSF. 2020. Available from: https://osf.io/3se47/. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vicente-Saez R, Martinez-Fuentes C. Open Science now: a systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research. 2018. Jul;88:428–36.

Publication types