Adopting a toolkit to manage time, resources, and expectations in the systematic review process: a case report
- PMID: 34858095
- PMCID: PMC8608198
- DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1221
Adopting a toolkit to manage time, resources, and expectations in the systematic review process: a case report
Abstract
Background: The proliferation of systematic reviews has impacted library operations and activities as librarians support, collaborate, and perform more tasks in the systematic review process. This case report describes a toolkit that librarians with extensive experience in supporting multiple review teams use to manage time, resources, and expectations in the systematic review process.
Case presentation: The toolkit is a compilation of documents that we use to effectively communicate with and help review teams understand and navigate each stage of the systematic review process. Elements included in the toolkit and discussed in this case report are intake forms, communication templates and memoranda, a process flow diagram, library guides on tools for retrieval and data appraisal, and established standards for guidance during the write-up stage. We describe the use of the toolkit for both education and project management, with a focus on its use in helping manage team time, resources, and expectations.
Discussion: The systematic review toolkit helps librarians connect systematic review steps and tasks to actionable items. The content facilitates and supports discussion and learning by both librarians and team members. This toolkit helps librarians share important information and resources for each stage of the process.
Keywords: expectations; process management; project management; systematic review; team management; toolkit.
Copyright © 2021 Q. Eileen Wafford, Linda C. O'Dwyer.
Similar articles
-
Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report.J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):643-647. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1222. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34858096 Free PMC article.
-
Graduate student confidence following a for-credit systematic review course pilot.J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 1;109(2):323-329. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1073. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34285676 Free PMC article.
-
The systematic review team: contributions of the health sciences librarian.Med Ref Serv Q. 2011;30(3):301-15. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2011.590425. Med Ref Serv Q. 2011. PMID: 21800987
-
Parent-delivered interventions used at home to improve eating, drinking and swallowing in children with neurodisability: the FEEDS mixed-methods study.Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(22):1-208. doi: 10.3310/hta25220. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 33769272 Free PMC article.
-
[Information specialists improve the quality of systematic reviews].Ugeskr Laeger. 2018 Jul 9;180(28):V10170721. Ugeskr Laeger. 2018. PMID: 29984706 Review. Danish.
Cited by
-
Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report.J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Oct 1;109(4):643-647. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1222. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34858096 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Grimshaw J. A guide to knowledge synthesis: a knowledge synthesis chapter. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2010.
-
- Beverley CA, Booth A, Bath PA. The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study. Health Info Libr J. 2003;20(2):65–74. - PubMed
-
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Defining the role of authors and contributors [Internet]. 2016. Available from: <http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/d...>.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources