Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2021 Nov 11:8:773653.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.773653. eCollection 2021.

Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes

Affiliations
Case Reports

Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes

Shahzia Lambat Emery et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Study Objective: Evaluate the effects of a fast-track (FT) protocol on costs and post-operative recovery. Methods: One hundred and seventy women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication were randomized in a FT protocol or a usual care protocol. A FT protocol included the combination of minimally invasive surgery, analgesia optimization, early oral refeeding and rapid mobilization of patients was compared to a usual care protocol. Primary outcome was costs. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, post-operative morbidity and patient satisfaction. Main Results: The mean total cost in the FT group was 13,070 ± 4,321 Euros (EUR) per patient, and that in the usual care group was 3.5% higher at 13,527 ± 3,925 EUR (p = 0.49). The FT group had lower inpatient surgical costs but higher total ambulatory costs during the first post-operative month. The mean hospital stay in the FT group was 52.7 ± 26.8 h, and that in the usual care group was 20% higher at 65.8 ± 33.7 h (p = 0.006). Morbidity during the first post-operative month was not significantly different between the two groups. On their day of discharge, the proportion of patients satisfied with pain management was similar in both groups [83% in FT and 78% in the usual care group (p = 0.57)]. Satisfaction with medical follow-up 1 month after surgery was also similar [91% in FT and 88% in the usual care group (p = 0.69)]. Conclusion: Implementation of a FT protocol in laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications has minimal non-significant effects on costs but significantly reduces hospital stay without increasing post-operative morbidity nor decreasing patient satisfaction. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04839263.

Keywords: fast-track; hospital costs; hospital stay; laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH); pain assessment; post-operative morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
FT and usual care protocol descriptions. Items in the FT protocol that differ from those in the usual care protocol are highlighted in bold. FT, fast-track; IV, intravenous.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study flowchart. FT, fast-track.

References

    1. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. (1995) 345:763ion10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90643-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesblesb P, Werner M, Kehlet H. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg. (2000) 232:51repa10.1097/00000658-200007000-00008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. (2002) 183:630 Wilm10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00866-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H, Behlet MW, Beart RW., Jr Billingham RP, Williamson R. Care after colonic operation–is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. J Am Coll Surg. (2006) 202:45gl Su10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.08.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. . Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. (2005) 24:466rd re10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data