Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;7(12):000728.
doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000728.

ECTyper: in silico Escherichia coli serotype and species prediction from raw and assembled whole-genome sequence data

Affiliations

ECTyper: in silico Escherichia coli serotype and species prediction from raw and assembled whole-genome sequence data

Kyrylo Bessonov et al. Microb Genom. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Escherichia coli is a priority foodborne pathogen of public health concern and phenotypic serotyping provides critical information for surveillance and outbreak detection activities. Public health and food safety laboratories are increasingly adopting whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for characterizing pathogens, but it is imperative to maintain serotype designations in order to minimize disruptions to existing public health workflows. Multiple in silico tools have been developed for predicting serotypes from WGS data, including SRST2, SerotypeFinder and EToKi EBEis, but these tools were not designed with the specific requirements of diagnostic laboratories, which include: speciation, input data flexibility (fasta/fastq), quality control information and easily interpretable results. To address these specific requirements, we developed ECTyper (https://github.com/phac-nml/ecoli_serotyping) for performing both speciation within Escherichia and Shigella, and in silico serotype prediction. We compared the serotype prediction performance of each tool on a newly sequenced panel of 185 isolates with confirmed phenotypic serotype information. We found that all tools were highly concordant, with 92-97 % for O-antigens and 98-100 % for H-antigens, and ECTyper having the highest rate of concordance. We extended the benchmarking to a large panel of 6954 publicly available E. coli genomes to assess the performance of the tools on a more diverse dataset. On the public data, there was a considerable drop in concordance, with 75-91 % for O-antigens and 62-90 % for H-antigens, and ECTyper and SerotypeFinder being the most concordant. This study highlights that in silico predictions show high concordance with phenotypic serotyping results, but there are notable differences in tool performance. ECTyper provides highly accurate and sensitive in silico serotype predictions, in addition to speciation, and is designed to be easily incorporated into bioinformatic workflows.

Keywords: E. coli; enteric pathogens; in silico serotyping; public health; serotyping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flowchart outlining the major stages within ECTyper. Input can be either raw reads or assemblies. Species identification is performed if the ‘--verify’ parameter is specified using MASH to determine the closest representative genome in NCBI RefSeq. Antigen predictions only proceed if the species is E. coli. In the case of raw reads as input, there is a preprocessing stage that aligns the reads against curated databases of genes used to predict O- and H-antigens and produce a consensus sequence. After the preprocessing stage, both reads and assemblies are processed the same. The best matching alleles for each of the genes is identified using blastn based on both %identity and %coverage values. A final report is output in tab-delimited format with the summary QC values (Table 1). See the Methods section for further details.

References

    1. World Health Organization WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference groupestimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group 2007-2015. World Health Organization; 2015.
    1. Havelaar AH, Kirk MD, Torgerson PR, Gibb HJ, Hald T, et al. World Health Organization Global Estimates and Regional Comparisons of the Burden of Foodborne Disease in 2010. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001923. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas MK, Murray R. Canadian Burden of Food-borne Illness Estimates Working Group. Estimating the burden of food-borne illness in Canada. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2014;40:299–302. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas MK, Murray R, Flockhart L, Pintar K, Pollari F, et al. Estimates of the Burden of Foodborne Illness in Canada for 30 specified pathogens and unspecified agents, Circa 2006. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013;10:639–648. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2012.1389. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Putten BCL, Matamoros S, Mende DR, Scholl ER, Consortium C, et al. Escherichia ruysiae sp. nov., a novel Gram-stain-negative bacterium, isolated from a faecal sample of an international traveller. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004609. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources