Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;29(2):184-192.
doi: 10.1111/acem.14424. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

Advanced practice providers in academic emergency medicine: A national survey of chairs and program directors

Affiliations
Free article

Advanced practice providers in academic emergency medicine: A national survey of chairs and program directors

Christopher R Carpenter et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Background: The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Board of Directors convened a task force to elucidate the current state of workforce, operational, and educational issues being faced by academic medical centers related to advanced practice providers (APPs). The task force surveyed academic emergency department (ED) chairs and residency program directors (PDs).

Methods: The survey was distributed to the Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine (AACEM)-member chairs and their respective residency PDs in 2021. We surveyed 125 chairs with their self-identified PDs. The survey sampled hiring, state-independent practice laws, scope of practice, teaching and supervision, training opportunities, delegation of procedures between physician learners and APPs, and perceptions of the impact on resident and medical student education.

Results: Of the AACEM-member chairs identified, 73% responded and 47% of PDs responded. Most (98%) employ either physician assistants or nurse practitioners. Among responding departments, 86% report APPs working in fast-track settings, 80% work in the main ED, and 54% work in the waiting room. In 44% of departments, APPs and residents evaluate patients concurrently, and 2% of respondents reported that APPs manage high-acuity patients without attending involvement. Two-thirds of chairs believe that APPs contribute positively to the quality of patient care, while 44% believe that APPs contribute to the academic environment. One-third of PDs believe that the presence of APPs interferes with resident education. Although 75% of PDs believe that residents require training to work effectively with APPs in the ED, almost half (49%) report zero hours of training around APP supervision or collaborative skills.

Conclusions: APPs are ubiquitous across academic EDs. Future research is required for academic ED leaders to balance physician and APP deployment across the academic ED within the context of patient care, resident education, institutional resources, professional development opportunities for APP staff, and standardization of APP EM training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

    1. Schneider SM, Gardner AF, Weiss LD, et al. The future of emergency medicine. J Emerg Nurs. 2010;36:330-335.
    1. Gettel CJ, Canavan ME, D'Onofrio GD, Carr BG, Venkatesh AJ. Who provides what care? An analysis of clinical focus among the national emergency care workforce. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;42:228-232.
    1. Reiter M, Allen BW. The emergency medicine workforce: shortage resolving, future surplus expected. J Emerg Med. 2020;58:198-202.
    1. Marco CA, Courtney DM, Ling LJ, et al. The emergency medicine physician workforce: projections for 2030. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;78(6):726-737.
    1. The Complexities of Physician Supply and Demand: Projections from 2019 to 2034. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2021.

LinkOut - more resources