Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 22;184(26):6299-6312.e22.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

NLRP3 cages revealed by full-length mouse NLRP3 structure control pathway activation

Affiliations

NLRP3 cages revealed by full-length mouse NLRP3 structure control pathway activation

Liudmila Andreeva et al. Cell. .

Abstract

The NACHT-, leucine-rich-repeat- (LRR), and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) is emerging to be a critical intracellular inflammasome sensor of membrane integrity and a highly important clinical target against chronic inflammation. Here, we report that an endogenous, stimulus-responsive form of full-length mouse NLRP3 is a 12- to 16-mer double-ring cage held together by LRR-LRR interactions with the pyrin domains shielded within the assembly to avoid premature activation. Surprisingly, this NLRP3 form is predominantly membrane localized, which is consistent with previously noted localization of NLRP3 at various membrane organelles. Structure-guided mutagenesis reveals that trans-Golgi network dispersion into vesicles, an early event observed for many NLRP3-activating stimuli, requires the double-ring cages of NLRP3. Double-ring-defective NLRP3 mutants abolish inflammasome punctum formation, caspase-1 processing, and cell death. Thus, our data uncover a physiological NLRP3 oligomer on the membrane that is poised to sense diverse signals to induce inflammasome activation.

Keywords: NEK7; NLRP3; TGN; TGN dispersion; cryo-EM; inflammasome; innate immunity; trans-Golgi network.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests H.W. is a co-founder of Ventus Therapeutics. P.P. is a co-founder of Viva in vitro diagnostics. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Purification and Overall Structure of the NLRP3 Double Ring Cage
(A) Domain organization of NLRP3. (B) SDS-PAGE of elution and sucrose gradient fractions of NLRP3 purified in the absence of any nucleotide and Western blot (WB) of the same fractions visualizing NEK7. (C) Representative negative-staining EM images of NLRP3 oligomers purified without nucleotide (top), with ADP and MCC950 (middle) or with dATP (bottom). (D) Representative 2D class averages of NLRP3 oligomers purified without any nucleotide (top), with ADP and MCC950 (middle) or with dATP (bottom). (E and F) Cryo-EM maps of NLRP3 cage species purified in presence of ADP and MCC950 (E) or dATP (F). Maps are colored by resolution. See also Figure S1–S3.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. NLRP3 Cage Is Formed by LRR-LRR Interactions with PYD Inside the Cavity
(A) Atomic model of the NLRP3 cage structure. NLRP3 domains are displayed with the color scheme in Figure 1A. (B and C) Overview and detailed views of “face-to-face” (B) and “back-to-back” (C) interaction interfaces. Residues used for mutagenesis are color-coded: green for “back-to-back” and yellow or magenta for “face-to-face” interfaces. (D) Sucrose gradient profiles and representative negative-staining EM images of WT NLRP3 (black) and mutant NLRP3 color coded as in (B and C). The profiles were calculated by quantification of SDS-PAGE gels in Figure S5A. The double ring cage containing fractions are highlighted in a red square. The ratios of the fraction 3 (“monomers”) and fraction 5 (“double ring cages”) to the sum of fractions 3 and 5 are shown for each profile. Residue numbers correspond to the mouse NLRP3 sequence (B-D). (E) A comparison of the NLRP3 monomer from the double ring cage with the NLRP3–NEK7 complex (PDB ID: 6NPY) (Sharif et al., 2019). NEK7 is shown in magenta. (F) Sucrose gradient profiles of NLRP3 (solid line) and NEK7 (dashed line) in samples containing NLRP3 cage (top) and NLRP3 cage incubated with an excess of NEK7 (bottom) calculated by quantification of SDS-PAGE in Figure S5A. The double ring cage containing fractions are highlighted in a red square. (G) A negative-staining EM image of NLRP3 cages incubated with an excess of NEK7. All data in (D, F-G) is from one representative out of ≥ 3 independent experiments. See also Figure S4 and S5.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. PYDs Are Shielded within Two NACHT-LRR Rings to Avoid Nucleating ASC
(A and B) Nucleation of ASCPYD filament formation by NLRP6PYD-NACHT (positive control) or NLRP3 cage, showing fluorescence quenching curves of Alexa488-labeled ASCPYD upon its oligomerization as a function of time (A) and the initial rates (B). RFU: relative fluorescence unit. Data are presented as mean ± s.d., n=3. Data is from one representative out of 3 independent experiments. (C) Central slices of the unsharpened maps of 7- (top) and 8-fold (bottom) NLRP3 cages obtained from the ADP + MCC950 sample. The PYD densities inside the NACHT-LRR cages are fitted with short NLRP3PYD helices of 7 or 8 monomers, respectively. The NLRP3PYD filament structure was modelled based on the ASCPYD filament structure (PDB ID: 3J63) (Lu et al., 2014). The polymerization directions of the filaments are indicated with the arrows. (D) A model of a 6-fold NLRP3 cage with two NLRP3PYD helices fitted with the polymerization directions (orange and blue arrowheads) facing the cavity (left) or the exterior (right). A distance between C-terminus of PYD (magenta) and the N-terminus of the NACHT is shown with black double-sided arrow. PYD to NACHT linker is shown with a dotted line. Polybasic region of the linker is in red. See also Figure S5.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. NLRP3 Double Ring Cages Are Mainly Associated with Membrane
(A) A negative-staining EM image of NLRP3 oligomers purified from the membrane extract of reconstituted HEK293T cells in the presence of dATP. (B) Whole cell lysate (Lysate), and cytosolic (Cyt) and membrane (Mem) fractions of LPS-treated WT iBMDM cells analyzed by WB using anti-NLRP3 antibody. (C) Sucrose gradient fractions of cytosolic and membrane extracts from LPS-treated WT iBMDMs analyzed by WB using anti-NLRP3 antibody. No nucleotide was added. (D) Native-PAGE of cytosolic and membrane extracts from LPS-treated WT and NLRP3−/− iBMDMs. The final sample of the NLRP3 cages purified in the presence of dATP for structure determination was used as the control. Anti-NLRP3 and anti-β-actin antibodies were used for the WB. The relative amount of NLRP3 loaded (“load”) in each lane was visualized with anti-NLRP3 antibody (bottom). (E) In vitro lipid blot assay of double-ring and monomeric (ΔPYD) forms of NLRP3 with intact (WT) or mutated (“Linker mutant”) polybasic region. On the left, lipid scheme of the membrane with negative-charged (red) and neutral (yellow) lipid head groups is shown. On the bottom, SDS-PAGE is shown as the loading control. (F) Position and sequence of a WT polybasic region of mouse NLRP3 and its mutation (Linker mutant). Residues involved in TGN binding are colored red and their mutations blue. (G) Sucrose gradient profiles of WT and linker mutant NLRP3 calculated by quantification of SDS-PAGE in Figure S5J. The double ring cage containing fractions are highlighted in a red square. (H) Negative-staining EM images of NLRP3 samples from (G). (I) Negative staining EM images of NLRP3 oligomers purified from the membrane fraction of HEK293T cells reconstituted with OSBP-tagged linker mutant (left) and OSBP-tagged LRRm2 mutant (right). All data is from one representative out of ≥ 3 independent experiments. See also Figure S5.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. NLRP3 Cage Is Required for TGN Dispersion and NLRP3 Activation
(A and B) Confocal imaging of WT (A) and NLRP3−/− (B) iBMDMs primed with LPS (top) or also treated with 20 μM nigericin for 1 h (bottom) by IF with goat anti-NLRP3 (magenta) and rabbit anti-TGN38 (green) antibodies, and DNA (Hoechst dye, blue). NLRP3 inflammasome specks are labelled with arrowheads. (C) Confocal imaging of NLRP3−/− iBMDMs reconstituted with WT human mScarlet-NLRP3 primed with LPS (top) or also treated with 20 μM nigericin for 1 h (bottom) for TGN38 (IF, green), NLRP3 (mScarlet, magenta) and DNA (Hoechst dye, blue). (D) Confocal imaging of NLRP3−/− iBMDMs reconstituted with WT human mScarlet-NLRP3 treated with LPS and MCC950 (top) or pre-treated with MCC950 and treated with 20 μM nigericin for 1 h (bottom) for TGN38 (IF, green), NLRP3 (mScarlet, magenta) and DNA (Hoechst dye, blue). (E-I) Confocal imaging of NLRP3−/− iBMDMs reconstituted with WT (E) or double ring cage disrupting mutants of human mScarlet-NLRP3 (LRRm2, 3, 5 and ΔPYD) (F-I) primed with LPS (top) or also treated with 20 μM nigericin for 1 h (bottom) for 58K Golgi protein (IF, green), NLRP3 (mScarlet, magenta) and DNA (Hoechst dye, blue). (J and K) Confocal imaging of NLRP3−/− iBMDMs reconstituted with NLRP3 linker-mutant (J) or OSBP-linker mutant (K) primed with LPS (top) or also treated with 20 μM nigericin for 1 h (bottom) for 58K Golgi protein (IF, green), NLRP3 (mScarlet, magenta) and DNA (Hoechst dye, blue). All images are maximum intensity Z projections with scale bars of 10 μm. All data is from one representative out of ≥ 3 independent experiments. See also Figure S6.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Quantified Effects of NLRP3 Cage Disruption in TGN Dispersion and NLRP3 Activation
(A) Quantification of TGN dispersion based on confocal imaging for LPS- and nigericin-treated WT iBMDMs, with or without MCC950 pretreatment, NLRP3−/− iBMDMs, NLRP3−/− iBMDMs reconstituted with WT or mutant human mScarlet-NLRP3, with or without the Golgi-binding OSBP domain. Data are presented as mean ± s.d., n=3. (B) Cell death indicated by LDH release for WT iBMDMs, NLRP3−/− iBMDMs, and NLRP3−/− iBMDMs reconstituted with WT or mutant NLRP3, with or without the Golgi-binding OSBP domain. The level of LDH release is shown as a fold change between LPS-primed cells treated or not with nigericin. Data are presented as mean ± s.d., n=3. All data is from one representative out of ≥ 3 independent experiments. See also Figure S7.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. NLRP3 Activation Model
Proposed structural rearrangements of NLRP3 in the course of NLRP3 activation. In a resting state NLRP3 exists presumably in both monomeric and double ring cage forms. Upon activation NLRP3 gets transported to MTOC, with either “closed” (top) or “open” (bottom) NACHT domains. At MTOC the double ring cages get disrupted by NEK7 leading to a partial and then full NLRP3 oligomerization in a form of an active inflammasome complex.

Comment in

References

    1. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, et al. (2010). PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 213–221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balla T, and Várnai P (2009). Visualization of cellular phosphoinositide pools with GFP-fused protein-domains. Curr Protoc Cell Biol Chapter 24, Unit-24.24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broz P, and Dixit VM (2016). Inflammasomes: mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling. Nature Reviews Immunology 16, 407–420. - PubMed
    1. Chen J, and Chen ZJ (2018). PtdIns4P on dispersed trans-Golgi network mediates NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature 564, 71–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coll RC, Hill JR, Day CJ, Zamoshnikova A, Boucher D, Massey NL, Chitty JL, Fraser JA, Jennings MP, Robertson AAB, et al. (2019). MCC950 directly targets the NLRP3 ATP-hydrolysis motif for inflammasome inhibition. Nat Chem Biol 15, 556–559. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms