Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;39(13-14):1010-1012.
doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0356. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

Traumatic Brain Injury: What Is a Favorable Outcome?

David A Zuckerman  1 , Joseph T Giacino  2 , Yelena G Bodien  2   3
Affiliations

Traumatic Brain Injury: What Is a Favorable Outcome?

David A Zuckerman et al. J Neurotrauma. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in disparate outcomes ranging from persistent disorders of consciousness to symptom resolution. Despite the breadth and complexity of TBI recovery, most clinical trials dichotomize outcome by establishing an arbitrary cut-point, above and below which recovery is described as "favorable" and "unfavorable," respectively. For example, the widely used eight-level Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) is typically collapsed into these two categories. Dichotomizing the GOSE into "favorable" and "unfavorable" outcome may limit detection of treatment effects in TBI clinical trials, contribute to imprecise prognostic counseling, and unduly influence decision-making with regard to withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. We illustrate the lack of standardization in defining "unfavorable" and "favorable" TBI outcome on the GOSE by identifying the broad range of cut-points, from a score of 3 (part-time supervision in the home required) to 7 (presence of some residual of symptoms), that have been used to dichotomize the GOSE. We also highlight the ethical concerns related to characterizing TBI outcomes solely from the perspective of investigators and clinicians, rather than patients and caregivers. Finally, we suggest that a pragmatic, immediate solution to GOSE dichotomization is to report the likelihood of achieving each of the eight GOSE outcome levels and propose a study design for a new patient- and caregiver-centered TBI outcome metric.

Keywords: Glasgow Outcome Scale; outcome; traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Y.G. Bodien reports funding from National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01 NS1365885, U01-NS086090), National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), Administration for Community Living (90DPCP0008-01-00, 90DP0039), James S. McDonnell Foundation, and Tiny Blue Dot Foundation.

J.T. Giacino reports funding from NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01-NS086090, UH3NS095554), U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-14-2-0176), National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), Administration for Community Living (90DPCP0008-01-00, 90DP0039)

For D.A. Zuckerman, no competing financial interests exist.

References

    1. Wilson, J.T., Pettigrew, L.E., and Teasdale, G.M. (1998). Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J. Neurotrauma 15, 573–585. - PubMed
    1. McMillan, T., Wilson, L., Ponsford, J., Levin, H., Teasdale, G., and Bond, M. (2016). The Glasgow Outcome Scale—40 years of application and refinement. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 12, 477–485. - PubMed
    1. Bragge, P., Synnot, A., Maas, A.I., Menon, D.K., Cooper, D.J., Rosenfeld, J.V., and Gruen, R.L. (2016). A state-of-the-science overview of randomized controlled trials evaluating acute management of moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 33, 1461–1478. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Altman, D.G., and Royston, P. (2006). The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ 332, 1080. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bagiella, E., Novack, T.A., Ansel, B., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Dikmen, S., Hart, T., and Temkin, N. (2010). Measuring outcome in traumatic brain injury treatment trials: recommendations from the traumatic brain injury clinical trials network. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 25, 375–382. - PMC - PubMed