Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb;130(2):59-81.
doi: 10.1111/apm.13197. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

Current and novel diagnostics for orthopedic implant biofilm infections: a review

Affiliations
Review

Current and novel diagnostics for orthopedic implant biofilm infections: a review

Dana Ronin et al. APMIS. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Biofilm infections involving orthopedic implants are a global problem. They contribute to severe complications and mortality, as well as increased use of antibiotic treatments and development of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. More than 1 million hip and knee arthroplasties are performed each year in the United States. These hard-to-treat infections lead to patient distress, increased morbidity, and high financial costs to both patients and healthcare systems. There is a need to improve the diagnosis of such biofilm infections to allow for earlier detection and treatment. Current diagnostics rely on clinical signs for infections such as loss of function, fever, rubor, patient history of the predisposing condition, persisting infection, failure of antibiotic treatment, and documentation of antibiotic failure. Below, we present a framework which outlines the data gaps in the conventional laboratory techniques used in clinical diagnostics; we also discuss promising novel diagnostic methods which are currently used solely in research. It is critical to assess these novel infection diagnostic techniques and address the data gaps and clinical hesitance preventing application in a clinical setting. Additionally, the combination of conventional and novel diagnostic technologies would streamline the diagnostic process of biofilm infections associated with orthopedic implants.

Keywords: Biofilm; diagnostics; infections; orthopedic implants; translational research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Lübbeke A, Silman AJ, Barea C, Prieto-Alhambra D, Carr AJ. Mapping existing hip and knee replacement registries in Europe. Health Policy. 2018;122(5):548-57.
    1. Yang L. 9 - Safety of nanotechnology-enhanced orthopedic materials. In: Yang L, editor. Nanotechnology-enhanced orthopedic materials [Internet]. Oxford: Woodhead Publishing; 2015 [cited 2020 Jul 27]. p. 181-95. (Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials). Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780857098443000094
    1. Kwee RM, Kwee TC. 18F-FDG PET for diagnosing infections in prosthetic joints. PET Clin. 2020;15(2):197-205.
    1. Xu Y, Larsen LH, Lorenzen J, Hall-Stoodley L, Kikhney J, Moter A, et al. Microbiological diagnosis of device-related biofilm infections. APMIS Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand. 2017;125(4):289-303.
    1. Gebreyohannes G, Nyerere A, Bii C, Sbhatu DB. Challenges of intervention, treatment, and antibiotic resistance of biofilm-forming microorganisms. Heliyon. 2019;5(8):e02192.

LinkOut - more resources