Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul 1;89(1):63-71.
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003055. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

Failed Acellular Nerve Allografts: A Critical Review

Affiliations
Review

Failed Acellular Nerve Allografts: A Critical Review

Calum Thomson et al. Ann Plast Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Acellular nerve allograft (ANA) occupies an increasingly prominent role in the treatment of peripheral nerve reconstruction. There is demonstrable efficacy; however, some grafts fail to support axonal regrowth and the reasons for this are unclear. This study examines the ANA experience in a specialized peripheral nerve surgery department to discuss the clinical and histological findings in failed cases.

Method: Failed ANA grafts were identified from a prospective database using Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) S3 and M3 as thresholds for success. Cases in which ANA grafting was indicated for nerve related pain and dysesthesia but where no subjective improvement in symptoms occurred were also included. Patients requiring revision surgery after ANA grafting were also considered failures. Cases were then examined in conjunction with a literature review to identify possible mechanisms of failure, including detailed histological analysis in 2 cases.

Results: Eight failed procedures were identified from a database of 99 separate allograft records on 74 patients. This included procedures for 2 tibial nerves, 2 superficial radial nerves, 2 median nerves, 1 digital nerve and a lateral cord brachial plexus injury (male/female, 5:3; age range, 24-54 years). Allograft length range 25 to 120 mm. One postoperative infection was identified. Histological findings in 2 cases included adequate vascularization of allograft material without subsequent axonal regeneration, a reduction of large myelinated fibers proximal to a tibial nerve allograft in the setting of a chronic injury, and a preference for small rather than large fiber regeneration.

Conclusions: This article reports instances of ANA graft failure in a variety of contexts, for which the primary reasons for failure remain unclear. The etiology is likely to be multifactorial with both patient, graft and surgeon factors contributing to failure. Further clinical and histological analysis of ANA failures will improve our understanding of the mechanisms of graft failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared.

References

    1. Zuo J, Neubauer D, Graham J, et al. Regeneration of axons after nerve transection repair is enhanced by degradation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan. Exp Neurol . 2002;176:221–228.
    1. Gause Ii TM, Sivak WN, Marra KG. The role of chondroitinase as an adjuvant to peripheral nerve repair. Cells Tissues Organs . 2015;200:59–68.
    1. Martins RS, Barbosa RA, Siqueira MG, et al. Morbidity following sural nerve harvesting: a prospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg . 2012;114:1149–1152.
    1. IJpma FF, Nicolai JP, Meek MF. Sural nerve donor-site morbidity: thirty-four years of follow-up. Ann Plast Surg . 2006;57:391–395.
    1. Meek MF, Coert JH, Robinson PH. Poor results after nerve grafting in the upper extremity: quo vadis? Microsurgery . 2005;25:396–402.

LinkOut - more resources