Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan-Dec:58:469580211060992.
doi: 10.1177/00469580211060992.

The Inefficient and Unjust Global Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccines: From a Perspective of Critical Global Justice

Affiliations

The Inefficient and Unjust Global Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccines: From a Perspective of Critical Global Justice

Zhehan Li et al. Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused huge losses and massive damage to socio-economic development around the globe, which might even potentially evolve into a humanitarian crisis as it continues to spread. In response to the further resulting public threats, collaborative research, rapid production, and efficient and just distribution of vaccines have been given a top priority. However, there exists a serious inefficiency and injustice in the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines among different countries, regions, and social classes currently. Richer countries and regions have acquired far more vaccines than needed, further exacerbating the severity of the epidemic in underdeveloped and marginalized countries and regions. From a perspective of critical global justice, we explore the causes of the inefficient and unjust global distribution of vaccines and comprehensively examine the shortcomings of the current distribution frameworks, such as COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access Facility (COVAX). Then, under the framework of critical global justice, we propose a multi-phase fair priority model that improves the existing proportional distribution mechanism. This solution to the global injustice reoptimizes the cross-border and domestic vaccine distribution and aims to resolve the pandemic more efficiently. The proposed framework and methodology of vaccine distribution could be taken as an opportunity to consistently promote the development of the global socio-economic structure towards global justice more broadly and systematically.

Keywords: COVID-19 vaccines; critical global justice; health policy; inequitable distribution; public policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Vaccine purchased by country (region) as of 2021/07/01. Note: The color represents the relative number of confirmed cases in a country or region, while the size of the circle represents the population. Data Source: Bloomberg and World Bank data.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Vaccine doses purchased by income level with the share of the global adult population. Data source: Duke Launch and Scale Speedometer, World Bank PNG, as of March 15th, 2021.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McNeil D, Jr. How much herd immunity is enough? The New York Times. 2020.
    1. Saksena N. Global justice and the COVID-19 vaccine: limitations of the public goods framework. Global Publ Health. 2021:1-10. - PubMed
    1. Berkley S. COVAX Explained. Geneva, Switzerland: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; 2020.
    1. Tabacek K. Small Group of Rich Nations Have Bought up More than Half the Future Supply of Leading COVID-19 Vaccine Contenders. Nairobi, Kenya: Oxfam International. 2020.
    1. Aaron H. The social insurance paradox. Can J Econ Polit Sci. 1966;32(3):371-374.

Publication types

Substances