Rapid Progression of Aortic Calcification in Older Men with Low Appendicular Lean Mass and Poor Physical Function
- PMID: 34866148
- PMCID: PMC12275551
- DOI: 10.1007/s12603-021-1697-0
Rapid Progression of Aortic Calcification in Older Men with Low Appendicular Lean Mass and Poor Physical Function
Abstract
Objectives: Assessment of the progression of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) may be a surrogate marker of the impact of physical function on cardiovascular risk. Our aim was to assess the risk of rapid AAC progression in older men with low relative appendicular lean mass (RALM) and poor physical function.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Community-dwelling older men.
Participants: 621 men aged 50-85 followed prospectively (baseline, 3 and 7.5 years).
Measurements: Body composition was assessed by DXA. Poor physical function was defined as incapacity to perform ≥1 of 5 clinical tests (balance, muscle strength). AAC was assessed using Kauppila's semiquantitative score. Reclassification improvement was assessed by comparing the areas under the curve (AUC) using DeLong's method.
Results: Rapid AAC progression (>0.6 point/year) was found in 168 men (27.1%). After adjustment for confounders including baseline AAC, the risk of rapid AAC progression increased with lower RALM (OR=1.42/SD, 95%CI: 1.09-1.86, p<0.01) and was higher in the lowest (<7.5kg/m2) vs. highest (>8.6kg/m2) quartile (OR=2.15, 95%CI: 1.17-3.95, p<0.01). Poor physical performance was associated with rapid AAC progression (OR=2.76, 95%CI: 1.48-5.91, p<0.005). Low RALM (<7.84kg/m2 defined using Youden's index) and poor physical function contributed to the risk of rapid AAC progression jointly. Men who had low RALM and poor physical function had higher risk of rapid AAC progression vs. men without these traits (OR=4.66, 95%CI: 1.72-12.62, p<0.05). RALM and physical function improved the identification of men with rapid AAC progression (DAUC=0.026, 95%CI: 0.005-0.046, p<0.05) after adjustment for confounders including baseline AAC score.
Conclusions: Low RALM and poor physical function are associated with higher risk of rapid AAC progression and possibly represent another measure of cardiovascular risk.
Keywords: Abdominal aortic calcification; ageing; men; physical function; sarcopenia.
Conflict of interest statement
All the authors have no conflict of interest concerning this study
Figures

References
-
- Leow K, Szulc P, Schousboe JT, et al. Prognostic Value of Abdominal Aortic Calcification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e017205. 10.1161/JAHA.120.017205 PubMed PMID: 33439672, PMCID 7955302. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lewis JR, Wong G, Taverniti A, Vucak-Dzumhur M, Elder GJ. Association between Aortic Calcification, Cardiovascular Events, and Mortality in Kidney and Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipients. Am J Nephrol. 2019;50:177–186. 10.1159/000502328 PubMed PMID: 31394536. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Oishi H, Horibe H, Yamase Y, et al. Predictive value of abdominal aortic calcification index for mid-term cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Heart Vessels. 2020;35:620–629. 10.1007/s00380-019-01527-6 PubMed PMID: 31707516. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schousboe JT, Taylor BC, Kiel DP, Ensrud KE, Wilson KE, McCloskey EV. Abdominal aortic calcification detected on lateral spine images from a bone densitometer predicts incident myocardial infarction or stroke in older women. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:409–416. 10.1359/jbmr.071024 PubMed PMID: 17956153. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Lennon L, Whincup PH. Decreased muscle mass and increased central adiposity are independently related to mortality in older men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:1339–1346. 10.1093/ajcn/86.5.1339 PubMed PMID: 17991644. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources