Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;49(2):177-187.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13583. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

Membrane fixation enhances guided bone regeneration in standardized calvarial defects: A pre-clinical study

Affiliations

Membrane fixation enhances guided bone regeneration in standardized calvarial defects: A pre-clinical study

Yin-Zhe An et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Aim: To determine whether collagen membrane (CM) fixation enhances guided bone regeneration in standardized defects.

Materials and methods: Four 8-mm-diameter defects were surgically made in eight rabbit calvaria, and randomly allocated into four groups: control (empty), unfixed-CM, fixed-CM, and unfixed-CM with bone graft (BG + CM) (positive control). After 1- and 4-week healing periods, the animals were sacrificed and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, micro-computed tomography, and histological outcomes were assessed.

Results: At week 1, the expression levels of BMP-2, FGF-2, VEGF, and osteocalcin were significantly higher in the fixed-CM group than in the unfixed-CM and control groups (p < .05). Conversely, cathepsin-K was significantly expressed in the unfixed-CM group. No significant differences in expression markers were observed between the fixed-CM and BG + CM groups (p > .05). At week 4, new bone formation was significantly higher in the fixed-CM group than the unfixed-CM and control groups (p < .05), but similar to the BG + CM group (p > .05).

Conclusions: CM fixation enhances the expression of osteogenic factors similar to BG + CM, leading to significantly more new bone formation. This suggests that the osteogenic potential is greater when membranes are fixed, thereby limiting the necessity of membrane-supporting materials to enhance bone formation.

Keywords: animal model; bone regeneration; collagen membrane; membrane fixation; osteogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Al-Kattan, R., Retzepi, M., Calciolari, E., & Donos, N. (2017). Microarray gene expression during early healing of GBR-treated calvarial critical size defects. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(10), 1248-1257. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12949
    1. Annen, B. M., Ramel, C. F., Hämmerle, C. H., & Jung, R. E. (2011). Use of a new cross-linked collagen membrane for the treatment of peri-implant dehiscence defects: A randomised controlled double-blinded clinical trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 4(2), 87-100.
    1. Becker, J., Al-Nawas, B., Klein, M. O., Schliephake, H., Terheyden, H., & Schwarz, F. (2009). Use of a new cross-linked collagen membrane for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects at titanium implants: A prospective, randomized-controlled double-blinded clinical multicenter study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20(7), 742-749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01689.x
    1. Behr, B., Sorkin, M., Lehnhardt, M., Renda, A., Longaker, M. T., & Quarto, N. (2012). A comparative analysis of the osteogenic effects of BMP-2, FGF-2, and VEGFA in a calvarial defect model. Tissue Engineering. Part A, 18(9-10), 1079-1086. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0537
    1. Benic, G. I., Eisner, B. M., Jung, R. E., Basler, T., Schneider, D., & Hämmerle, C. H. F. (2019). Hard tissue changes after guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects comparing block versus particulate bone substitutes: 6-Month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 30(10), 1016-1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13515

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources