Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 18;14(11):100605.
doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100605. eCollection 2021 Nov.

Age-related differences in characteristics of anaphylaxis in Chinese children from infancy to adolescence

Affiliations

Age-related differences in characteristics of anaphylaxis in Chinese children from infancy to adolescence

Nannan Jiang et al. World Allergy Organ J. .

Abstract

Background: Little is known about anaphylaxis in Chinese children. This study aimed to determine the age-specific patterns of anaphylaxis in Chinese children.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of anaphylaxis cases attending an allergy department in a tertiary children's hospital.

Results: A total of 279 anaphylactic reactions in 177 patients were analyzed. Overall, 57.6% (102/177) of first anaphylaxis events occurred in infants (0-2 ys). Foods were the most common culprits (88.5%), followed by food + exercise/exercise (4.7%), and drugs (4.3%). The main food allergens were cow's milk (32.9%), egg (21.4%), and wheat (20.7%) in infants, compared with fruits/vegetables at 35.9% in preschool-age children (3-6 ys) and 31.6% in school-age children (7-12 ys). The most commonly implicated drug triggers were vaccines (n = 5, comprising DTaP n = 2, group A + C meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine n = 1, Sabin vaccine n = 1, and not specified n = 1). Among the 5 vaccine-induced anaphylaxis patients, 4 had severe cow's milk allergy. The clinical manifestations were mainly mucocutaneous (86.0%), followed by respiratory (68.8%), gastrointestinal (23.7%), neurological (10.4%), and cardiovascular (0.7%). Compared with patients of other ages, infants had higher rates of hives (0-2ys 77.4%, 3-6ys 50%,7-12ys 57.9%, 13-17ys 38.9%, p = 0.016) and vomiting (0-2ys 20.7%, 3-6ys 1.6%,7-12ys 8.8%, p < 0.001), while wheezing was more frequent in school-age children (0-2ys 21.4%, 3-6ys 25%, 7-12ys 38.6%, 13-17ys 5.6%, p = 0.017) and abdominal pain was more common in adolescents (0-2ys 2.1%,3-6ys 15.6%, 7-12ys 14.0%, 13-17ys 72.3%, p < 0.001). Regarding treatment, 9.3% of anaphylaxis events and 24.1% of life-threatening reactions were treated with epinephrine.

Conclusions: We observed age-related clinical patterns of anaphylaxis in this study, with hives and vomiting most commonly reported in infants and cardiovascular symptoms rarely reported in children. Wheat was the third most culprit food allergen after egg and milk in infancy. Education regarding more aggressive use of epinephrine in the emergency setting is clearly needed. Recognition of age-related symptoms in anaphylaxis can aid physicians in prompt diagnosis and acute management.

Keywords: Anaphylaxis; Food allergy; Infancy; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All of authors report no competing interests or financial disclosure.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The anaphylactic triggers for the 279 anaphylactic events. A. The anaphylactic triggers for the 279 anaphylactic events (food 88.5%, food + exercise/exercise 4.7%, drug 4.3%, idiopathic 2.5%); B. When analyzing the differences between triggers with regards to age groups, food-induced anaphylaxis were more common in the age group 0–2 years, while food + exercise/exercise-induced and idiopathic anaphylaxis were significantly higher in the age group 13–17 years; C. When comparing the differences between food causes with regards to age groups, milk, egg, and wheat were significantly more common in infants; Fruits/vegetables were significantly more frequent in children aged 3–6 years and children aged 7–12 years.

References

    1. Cardona V., Ansotegui I.J., Ebisawa M., et al. World allergy organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020. World Allergy Organ J. 2020;13:100472. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sampson H.A., Muñoz-Furlong A., Campbell R.L., et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report--second national institute of allergy and infectious disease/food allergy and anaphylaxis Network symposium. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:373–380. - PubMed
    1. Tejedor Alonso M.A., Moro Moro M., Múgica García M.V. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2015;45:1027–1039. - PubMed
    1. Tejedor-Alonso M.A., Moro-Moro M., Múgica-García M.V. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis: contributions from the last 10 years. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2015;25:163–175. quiz follow 174-165. - PubMed
    1. Braganza S.C., Acworth J.P., Mckinnon D.R., et al. Paediatric emergency department anaphylaxis: different patterns from adults. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91:159–163. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources