Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies
- PMID: 34868616
- PMCID: PMC8642048
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076211047390
Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in clinical and community care settings: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies
Abstract
Objective: Machine learning involves the use of algorithms without explicit instructions. Of late, machine learning models have been widely applied for the prediction of type 2 diabetes. However, no evidence synthesis of the performance of these prediction models of type 2 diabetes is available. We aim to identify machine learning prediction models for type 2 diabetes in clinical and community care settings and determine their predictive performance.
Methods: The systematic review of English language machine learning predictive modeling studies in 12 databases will be conducted. Studies predicting type 2 diabetes in predefined clinical or community settings are eligible. Standard CHARMS and TRIPOD guidelines will guide data extraction. Methodological quality will be assessed using a predefined risk of bias assessment tool. The extent of validation will be categorized by Reilly-Evans levels. Primary outcomes include model performance metrics of discrimination ability, calibration, and classification accuracy. Secondary outcomes include candidate predictors, algorithms used, level of validation, and intended use of models. The random-effects meta-analysis of c-indices will be performed to evaluate discrimination abilities. The c-indices will be pooled per prediction model, per model type, and per algorithm. Publication bias will be assessed through funnel plots and regression tests. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to estimate the effects of study quality and missing data on primary outcome. The sources of heterogeneity will be assessed through meta-regression. Subgroup analyses will be performed for primary outcomes.
Ethics and dissemination: No ethics approval is required, as no primary or personal data are collected. Findings will be disseminated through scientific sessions and peer-reviewed journals.
Prospero registration number: CRD42019130886.
Keywords: Type 2 diabetes; machine learning; meta-analysis; prediction models; protocol.
© The Author(s) 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Use and performance of machine learning models for type 2 diabetes prediction in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Med Inform. 2020 Nov;143:104268. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104268. Epub 2020 Sep 7. Int J Med Inform. 2020. PMID: 32950874
-
Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques.BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 11;10(11):e038832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038832. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33177137 Free PMC article.
-
Machine learning methods for automatic pain assessment using facial expression information: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(49):e13421. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013421. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30544420 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26. Artif Intell Med. 2019. PMID: 31383477 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing the potentiality of algorithms and artificial intelligence adoption to disrupt patient primary care with a safer and faster medication management: a systematic review protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 May 17;12(5):e057399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057399. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35580973 Free PMC article.
-
Machine learning for diabetes clinical decision support: a review.Adv Comput Intell. 2022;2(2):22. doi: 10.1007/s43674-022-00034-y. Epub 2022 Apr 13. Adv Comput Intell. 2022. PMID: 35434723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Review: Machine learning in precision pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes-A promising future or a glimpse of hope?Digit Health. 2023 Sep 29;9:20552076231203879. doi: 10.1177/20552076231203879. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 37786401 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Detection of the most influential variables for preventing postpartum urinary incontinence using machine learning techniques.Digit Health. 2022 Jul 5;8:20552076221111289. doi: 10.1177/20552076221111289. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2022. PMID: 35832475 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting three-month fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin changes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus based on multiple machine learning algorithms.Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 30;13(1):16437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43240-5. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37777593 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lantz B. Machine learning with R. 3rd edition. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd, 2019, pp.1–26.
-
- Nilashi M, Ibrahim O, Dalvi M, et al. Accuracy improvement for diabetes disease classification: a case on a public medical dataset. Fuzzy Inform Eng 2017; 9: 345–357.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources