Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 16:11:762653.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.762653. eCollection 2021.

Early Death and Survival of Patients With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in ATRA Plus Arsenic Era: A Population-Based Study

Affiliations

Early Death and Survival of Patients With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in ATRA Plus Arsenic Era: A Population-Based Study

Hong-Hu Zhu et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Most randomized trials for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have investigated highly selected patients under idealized conditions, and the findings need to be validated in the real world. We conducted a population-based study of all APL patients in Zhejiang Province, China, with a total population of 82 million people, to assess the generalization of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic as front-line treatment. The outcomes of APL patients were also analyzed. Between January 2015 and December 2019, 1,233 eligible patients were included in the final analysis. The rate of ATRA and arsenic as front-line treatment increased steadily from 66.2% in 2015 to 83.3% in 2019, with no difference among the size of the center (≥5 or <5 patients per year, p = 0.12) or age (≥60 or <60 years, p = 0.35). The early death (ED) rate, defined as death within 30 days after diagnosis, was 8.2%, and the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 87.9% in the whole patient population. Age (≥60 years) and white blood cell count (>10 × 109/L) were independent risk factors for ED and OS in the multivariate analysis. This population-based study showed that ATRA and arsenic as front-line treatment are widely used under real-world conditions and yield a low ED rate and a high survival rate, which mimic the results from clinical trials, thereby supporting the wider application of APL guidelines in the future.

Keywords: ATRA; acute promyelocytic leukemia; arsenic; early death; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow and treatment protocol recommended by guideline 2014. (A) Shown is the flow of screening, exclusion, and retention. A total of 99 patients transferred to at least two medical centers. Moreover, 103 patients did not have a definitive diagnosis [11 patients did not perform bone marrow puncture examination, including four early deaths; four patients had a typical acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) morphology, but the karyotype and molecular biology was negative; 88 patients had a typical APL morphology without karyotype and molecular biology results, including 15 early deaths]. The treatment information of 26 patients was missing. (B) Induction therapy lasts for at least 4 weeks until complete remission is achieved. The chemotherapy drugs included anthracycline, cytarabine, and homoharringtonine. One single agent was usually used as induction chemotherapy regimen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The rate of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)/arsenic as first-line treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia and outcomes. Shown is the rate of ATRA/arsenic as first-line treatment which changed with the alteration of year (A), center size (B), and age (C). The early death rate (D) and estimated survival (E, F) were compared between ATRA/arsenic group and ATRA/anthracycline group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The survival between different risk groups and ages. The early death rate (A) and estimated survival (B, C) were compared between high-risk group (WBC>10×10E9/L) and non-high-risk group (WBC≤10×10E9/L). The early death rate (D) and estimated survival (E, F) were also compared between patients ≥60 years and <60 years.

References

    1. Collins R, Bowman L, Landray M, Peto R. The Magic of Randomization Versus the Myth of Real-World Evidence. N Engl J Med (2020) 382(7):674–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1901642 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sherman RE, Anderson SA, Dal Pan GJ, Gray GW, Gross T, Hunter NL, et al. . Real-World Evidence - What Is It and What Can It Tell Us? N Engl J Med (2016) 375(23):2293–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gerstein HC, McMurray J, Holman RR. Real-World Studies No Substitute for RCTs in Establishing Efficacy. Lancet (2019) 393(10168):210–1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32840-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reith C, Landray M, Devereaux PJ, Bosch J, Granger CB, Baigent C, et al. . Randomized Clinical Trials — Removing Unnecessary Obstacles. N Engl J Med (2013) 369:1061–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1300760 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dahlén SE, Dahlén B, Drazen JM. Asthma Treatment Guidelines Meet the Real World. N Engl J Med (2011) 364(18):1769–70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1100937 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources