Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):e94-e96.
doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001097.

Association of 5 F and 6 F radial sheath with the incidence of radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

Surya Dharma  1 , William Kamarullah  2 , Nurcahyani  2 , Rachmatu Bill Multazam  2 , Claudia Mary Josephine  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Association of 5 F and 6 F radial sheath with the incidence of radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

Surya Dharma et al. Coron Artery Dis. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, Staudt A, Völzke H, Felix SB. A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 57:172–176.
    1. Gobeil F, Brück M, Louvard Y, Levèvre T, Morice MC, Ludwig J. Comparison of 5 French versus 6 French guiding catheters for transradial coronary intervention: a prospective, randomized study. J Invasive Cardiol 2004; 16:353–355.
    1. Gwon HC, Doh JH, Choi JH, Lee SH, Hong KP, Park JE, Seo JD. A 5Fr catheter approach reduces patient discomfort during transradial coronary intervention compared with a 6Fr approach: a prospective randomized study. J Interv Cardiol 2006; 19:141–147.
    1. Kindel M, Rüppel R. Hydrophilic-coated sheaths increase the success rate of transradial coronary procedures and reduce patient discomfort but do not reduce the occlusion rate: randomized single-blind comparison of coated vs. non-coated sheaths. Clin Res Cardiol 2008; 97:609–614.
    1. Aminian A, Saito S, Takahashi A, Bernat I, Jobe RL, Kajiya T, et al. Comparison of a new slender 6 Fr sheath with a standard 5 Fr sheath for transradial coronary angiography and intervention: RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT), a randomised multicentre trial. EuroIntervention 2017; 13:e549–e556.

LinkOut - more resources