Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Feb 1;176(2):e215103.
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.5103. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

Social Risk Interventions and Health Care Utilization for Pediatric Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Social Risk Interventions and Health Care Utilization for Pediatric Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Jordan Tyris et al. JAMA Pediatr. .

Abstract

Importance: Social determinants of health (SDOH) correlate with pediatric asthma morbidity, yet whether interventions addressing social risks are associated with asthma outcomes among children is unclear.

Objective: To catalog asthma interventions by the social risks they address and synthesize their associations with asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations among children.

Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, CINAHL, and references of included full-text articles were searched from January 1, 2008, to June 16, 2021.

Study selection: Included articles were US-based studies evaluating the associations of interventions addressing 1 or more social risks with asthma-related ED visits and hospitalizations among children. The systematic review included 38 of the original 641 identified articles (6%), and the meta-analysis included 19 articles (3%).

Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. The SDOH intervention clusters were identified by grouping studies according to the social risks they addressed, using the Healthy People 2020 SDOH framework. Random-effects models created pooled risk ratios (RRs) as the effect estimates.

Main outcomes and measures: Patients with ED visits or hospitalizations were the primary outcomes. Subgroup analyses were conducted by an SDOH intervention cluster. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for each, removing outlier studies and studies failing to meet the minimum quality threshold.

Results: In total, 38 studies were included in the systematic review, with 19 of these studies providing data for the meta-analysis (5441 participants). All interventions addressed 1 or more of the health, environment, and community domains; no interventions focused on the economy or education domains. In the primary analysis, social risk interventions were associated with decreased ED visits (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57-0.81; I2 = 70%) and hospitalizations (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37-0.68; I2 = 69%). In subgroup analyses, the health, environment, and community intervention cluster produced the lowest RR for ED visits (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44-0.64; I2 = 50%) and for hospitalizations (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.20-0.55; I2 = 71%) compared with other intervention clusters. Sensitivity analyses did not alter primary or subgroup effect estimates.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that social risk interventions are associated with decreased asthma-related ED visits and hospitalizations among children. These findings suggest that addressing social risks may be a crucial component of pediatric asthma care to improve health outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Parikh reported grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flowchart of Study Identification and Selection
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Risk of an Emergency Department Visit Following Participation in a Social Risk–Based Intervention
Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% CIs were the effect estimates (with random-effects models and inverse-variance analysis) for each outcome.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Risk of Hospitalization Following Participation in a Social Risk–Based Intervention
Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% CIs were the effect estimates (with random-effects models and inverse-variance analysis) for each outcome.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Social determinants of health. Accessed March 10, 2021. https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1
    1. Green K, Zook M. When talking about social determinants, precision matters. Health Affairs blog. Posted October 29, 2019. Accessed March 10, 2021. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20191025.776011/full/ - DOI
    1. Castrucci BC, Auerbach J. Meeting individual social needs falls short of addressing social determinants of health. Health Affairs blog. Posted January 16, Published 2019. Accessed March 10, 2021. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20190115.234942/full/ - DOI
    1. Berkowitz SA, Terranova J, Hill C, et al. . Meal delivery programs reduce the use of costly health care in dually eligible medicare and medicaid beneficiaries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(4):535-542. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0999 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Hospital Association. Case study: University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences system’s Better Health Through Housing Program. Published March 6, 2018. Accessed March 10, 2021. https://www.aha.org/news/insights-and-analysis/2018-03-06-case-study-uni...