Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jan-Feb;45(1):E270-E278.
doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000914.

Effects of Walking on Fatigue in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of Walking on Fatigue in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Pengcheng Wang et al. Cancer Nurs. 2022 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Background: Walking is a simple form of exercise that is easily accepted by patients. Exercise is one of the main ways to control cancer-related fatigue (CRF). However, there are conflicting data on the association between walking and severity of CRF.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the overall effect of walking on CRF among adult cancer patients.

Methods: Databases including PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed to identify suitable randomized controlled trials from inception to February 29, 2020. Two reviewers independently evaluated the risk of bias and extracted correlated data with Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews on Interventions. The data analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3.

Results: A total of 12 studies with 1064 patients were identified. Integrated result analysis of walking yielded a statistically significant effect on CRF (standard mean difference [SMD], -0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.06 to -0.26). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that intervention time longer than 6 weeks (SMD, -0.89; 95% CI, -1.22 to -0.57) had a better effect on fatigue compared with that of less than 6 weeks (SMD, 0.03; 95% CI, -0.39 to 0.45). The study showed walking was statistically more effective than the control intervention in patients undergoing cancer treatment (SMD, -0.79; 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.42). Descriptive analysis also showed that walking was effective for cancer patients who completed treatment.

Conclusions: Walking is effective for CRF during and after cancer therapy.

Implications for practice: The results provide evidence for a general exercise form to relieve fatigue in cancer patients and facilitate support for future clinical trials and work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, Abbasi N, et al; Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(12):1749–1768.
    1. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–1075.
    1. Fletcher C, Wilson C, Hutchinson AD, Grunfeld EA. The relationship between anticipated response and subsequent experience of cancer treatment-related side effects: a meta-analysis comparing effects before and after treatment exposure. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;68:86–93.
    1. Roila F, Fumi G, Ruggeri B, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and treatment of fatigue in oncological cancer patients in Italy: a cross-sectional study of the Italian Network for Supportive Care in Cancer (NICSO). Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(3):1041–1047.
    1. Wang XS, Zhao F, Fisch MJ, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of moderate to severe fatigue: a multicenter study in cancer patients and survivors. Cancer. 2014;120(3):425–432.

LinkOut - more resources