Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of acute esophageal necrosis and severe reflux esophagitis
- PMID: 34871245
- PMCID: PMC8568454
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027672
Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of acute esophageal necrosis and severe reflux esophagitis
Abstract
The similarities and differences between acute esophageal necrosis and severe reflux esophagitis have not been elucidated. We compared Los Angeles classification Grade C reflux esophagitis, Grade D reflux esophagitis, and acute esophageal necrosis to consider the similarities and differences between acute esophageal necrosis and severe reflux esophagitis.We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy at a tertiary referral center from January 2012 to December 2019. Data on patients diagnosed as Grade C reflux, Grade D reflux, or acute esophageal necrosis for the first time were extracted for analysis.A total of 213 patients were enrolled in the study, composed of 130 Grade C reflux, 74 Grade D reflux, and 9 acute esophageal necrosis patients. Compared to Grade C reflux patients, Grade D reflux and acute esophageal necrosis patients were more likely to be transfused (P = .013 and P = .011, respectively), to have duodenal ulcers (P = .025 and P = .049, respectively), and to have psychiatric illnesses (P = .022 and P = .018, respectively). Compared to both Grade C and D reflux, acute esophageal necrosis patients were more likely to present with shock (P = .003 and P < .001, respectively), have type 1 diabetes (P = .030 and P = .004, respectively), and present in winter (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). Significant step-wise differences (Grade C < Grade D < acute esophageal necrosis) were observed in the need for admission (P < .001 and P = .009), coffee ground emesis (P < .001 and P = .022), and stigmata of hemorrhage on endoscopy (P = .002 and P < .001). Admission (P = .003) and coffee ground emesis (P = .003) independently predicted either Grade D reflux or acute esophageal necrosis over Grade C reflux on multivariate analysis.Shock, type 1 diabetes, and winter may predict acute esophageal necrosis, while the need for admission and coffee ground emesis may predict Grade D reflux or acute esophageal necrosis.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interests to disclose.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Bleeding and stenosis caused by reflux esophagitis was not common in emergency endoscopic examinations: a retrospective patient chart review at a single institution in Japan.J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(4):265-9. doi: 10.1007/s00535-007-2157-2. Epub 2008 May 6. J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18458841
-
Relevance of ineffective esophageal motility and hyperactive acid sensitization in patients with gastroesophageal reflux.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Oct;22(10):1662-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04987.x. Epub 2007 Jun 7. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007. PMID: 17559356
-
Endoscopic grading of gastroesophageal flap valve and atrophic gastritis is helpful to predict gastroesophageal reflux.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Feb;23(2):208-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05038.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008. PMID: 18289353
-
Endoscopic evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease.Yale J Biol Med. 1999 Mar-Jun;72(2-3):93-100. Yale J Biol Med. 1999. PMID: 10780570 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Severe reflux esophagitis.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1994 Oct;4(4):677-98. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1994. PMID: 7812641 Review.
Cited by
-
Esophageal ulcer associated with mild hemophilia A: case report.Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2022 Jul-Sep;63(3):581-585. doi: 10.47162/RJME.63.3.14. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2022. PMID: 36588498 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, et al. . The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 1996;111:85–92. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical