Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 6;15(12):e0009966.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009966. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Assessment of community support for Wolbachia-mediated population suppression as a control method for Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in a community cohort in Puerto Rico

Affiliations

Assessment of community support for Wolbachia-mediated population suppression as a control method for Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in a community cohort in Puerto Rico

Liliana Sánchez-González et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Arboviral diseases transmitted by Aedes species mosquitoes pose an increasing public health challenge in tropical regions. Wolbachia-mediated population suppression (Wolbachia suppression) is a vector control method used to reduce Aedes mosquito populations by introducing male mosquitoes infected with Wolbachia, a naturally occurring endosymbiotic bacterium. When Wolbachia-infected male mosquitoes mate with female wild mosquitoes, the resulting eggs will not hatch. Public support is vital to the successful implementation and sustainability of vector control interventions. Communities Organized to Prevent Arboviruses (COPA) is a cohort study to determine the incidence of arboviral disease in Ponce, Puerto Rico and evaluate vector control methods. Focus groups were conducted with residents of COPA communities to gather their opinion on vector control methods; during 2018-2019, adult COPA participants were interviewed regarding their views on Wolbachia suppression; and a follow-up questionnaire was conducted among a subset of participants and non-participants residing in COPA communities. We analyzed factors associated with support for this method. Among 1,528 participants in the baseline survey, median age was 37 years and 63% were female. A total of 1,032 (68%) respondents supported Wolbachia suppression. Respondents with an income of $40,000 or more were 1.34 times as likely [95% CI: 1.03, 1.37] to support Wolbachia suppression than those who earned less than $40,000 annually. Respondents who reported repellant use were 1.19 times as likely to support Wolbachia suppression [95% CI: 1.03, 1.37]. A follow-up survey in 2020 showed that most COPA participants (86%) and non-participants living in COPA communities (84%) supported Wolbachia suppression during and after an educational campaign. The most frequent questions regarding this method were related to its impact on human and animal health, and the environment. Continuous community engagement and education efforts before and during the implementation of novel vector control interventions are necessary to increase and maintain community support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Summary of data sources for assessment of community acceptability of Wolbachia suppression method, Ponce, Puerto Rico, 2017–2020.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Acceptability of vector control interventions, COPA, Ponce, Puerto Rico, 2018–2019.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shepard DS, Undurraga EA, Halasa YA, Stanaway JD. The global economic burden of dengue: a systematic analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(8):935–41. Epub 2016/04/20. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00146-8 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stanaway JD, Shepard DS, Undurraga EA, Halasa YA, Coffeng LE, Brady OJ, et al.. The global burden of dengue: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(6):712–23. Epub 2016/02/15. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00026-8 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5012511. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Messina JP, Brady OJ, Golding N, Kraemer MUG, Wint GRW, Ray SE, et al.. The current and future global distribution and population at risk of dengue. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4(9):1508–15. Epub 2019/06/12. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0476-8 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6784886. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al.. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446):504–7. Epub 2013/04/09. doi: 10.1038/nature12060 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3651993. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilder-Smith A, Ooi EE, Horstick O, Wills B. Dengue. Lancet. 2019;393(10169):350–63. Epub 2019/01/31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32560-1 . - DOI - PubMed