Impact of demographic and perioperative risk factors on complication rates in skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction using titanized polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra)
- PMID: 34871867
- DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101675
Impact of demographic and perioperative risk factors on complication rates in skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction using titanized polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra)
Abstract
Background: Skin/nipple-sparing mastectomies (SSM/NSSM) have been reported to have acceptable complication rates and good aesthetic outcomes with high patient satisfaction. However, in this relatively young and rapidly expanding field of reconstructive plastic surgery, differences in perioperative management are noted between breast centers. Prospective studies of complication rates using a titanized polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra) are currently lacking.
Methods: A prospective subgroup analysis was performed based on the data set of the prospective, single-arm, multicenter observational study (PRO-BRA). Early complication rates after skin/nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based immediate or secondary reconstruction using a titanized polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra) subpectorally were investigated in relation to demographic factors, as well as intra-and postoperative management. The subgroup consists of 258 patients. Complications were categorised into necrosis, infection, postoperative bleeding or hematoma, seroma, wound healing delays and R1-situations.
Results: Early complication rates of SSM/NSSM using titanium-based meshes are comparable to complication-rates using ADM's. Logistic regression shows significantly higher risk for wound healing delays, necrosis and seroma with increasing BMI, abladat- and implant-weight (OR 1,17 -1,66, p-value < 0,001). Smokers have significantly higher necrosis rates (20.7%) compared to non-smokers (5.5%) (p-value = 0.002). Discharge with drainage results in a trend toward higher rates of wound healing complications.
Conclusion: The use of TiLOOP® Bra meshes was shown to have acceptable complication rates. Complication rates depend on certain demographic and intraoperative risk factors and should be considered in indications and information of patients.
Keywords: Breast reconstruction; Complication rate; Skin-sparing mastectomy; Surgical mesh.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Breast reconstruction with TiLOOP® Bra: Another arrow in plastic surgeons' quiver?J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Oct;97:89-114. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.060. Epub 2024 Jul 29. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024. PMID: 39151289
-
Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Mar;48(5):925-935. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03500-1. Epub 2023 Jul 18. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 37464216
-
Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):8e-19e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290f8a0. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23806958 Clinical Trial.
-
Management of Implant Exposure in One-Stage Breast Reconstruction Using Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh: Sub-Mammary Intercostal Perforator Flap.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Dec;40(6):896-900. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0720-z. Epub 2016 Oct 20. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016. PMID: 27766402
-
A short follow-up of prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using TiLOOP® Bra surgical mesh.Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;22(8):1115-1119. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_487_18. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019. PMID: 31417055
Cited by
-
Serratus Anterior Fascia for Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Case Series of 65 Patients With Breast Cancer.Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Feb 1;92(2):169-173. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003769. Epub 2023 Dec 28. Ann Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 38157477 Free PMC article.
-
Real-world data of perioperative complications in prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Dec;310(6):3077-3089. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07807-5. Epub 2024 Nov 7. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 39505750
-
A Retrospective Study Assessing the Outcomes of Immediate Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant and Mesh-Based Breast Reconstruction.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;14(13):3188. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133188. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35804960 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Synthetic Mesh Outcomes in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction.Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Aug 21;6:ojae066. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae066. eCollection 2024. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024. PMID: 39346802 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical