Development and validation of machine learning models for the prediction of blunt cerebrovascular injury in children
- PMID: 34872731
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.11.008
Development and validation of machine learning models for the prediction of blunt cerebrovascular injury in children
Abstract
Background: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is a rare finding in trauma patients. The previously validated BCVI (Denver and Memphis) prediction model in adult patients was shown to be inadequate as a screening option in injured children. We sought to improve the detection of BCVI by developing a prediction model specific to the pediatric population.
Methods: The National Trauma Databank (NTDB) was queried from 2007 to 2015. Test and training datasets of the total number of patients (885,100) with complete ICD data were used to build a random forest model predicting BCVI. All ICD features not used to define BCVI (2268) were included within the random forest model, a machine learning method. A random forest model of 1000 decision trees trying 7 variables at each node was applied to training data (50% of the dataset, 442,600 patients) and validated with test data in the remaining 50% of the dataset. In addition, Denver and Memphis model variables were re-validated and compared to our new model.
Results: A total of 885,100 pediatric patients were identified in the NTDB to have experienced blunt pediatric trauma, with 1,998 (0.2%) having a diagnosis of BCVI. Skull fractures (OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.003-1.004), extremity fractures (OR 1.001, 95% 1.0006-1.002), and vertebral injuries (OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.003-1.004) were associated with increased risk for BCVI. The BCVI prediction model identified 94.4% of BCVI patients and 76.1% of non-BCVI patients within the NTDB. This study identified ICD9/ICD10 codes with strong association to BCVI. The Denver and Memphis criteria were re-applied to NTDB data to compare validity and only correctly identified 13.4% of total BCVI patients and 99.1% of non BCVI patients.
Conclusion: The prediction model developed in this study is able to better identify pediatric patients who should be screened with further imaging to identify BCVI.
Level of evidence: Retrospective diagnostic study-level III evidence.
Keywords: Denver; Memphis model; Pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries in pediatric trauma patients.J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Sep;54(9):1861-1865. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.04.014. Epub 2019 Apr 25. J Pediatr Surg. 2019. PMID: 31101425
-
Pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury: the McGovern screening score.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Jun;21(6):639-649. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.PEDS17498. Epub 2018 Mar 16. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 29547069
-
Cervical seatbelt sign is not associated with blunt cerebrovascular injury in children: A review of the national trauma databank.Am J Surg. 2019 Jul;218(1):100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 15. Am J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30343878
-
Pediatric Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Approach and Management.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Apr 1;40(4):319-322. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002967. Epub 2023 May 10. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024. PMID: 37159384 Review.
-
A bibliometric analysis of blunt cerebrovascular injury: the top 50 most instrumental articles.Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 28;48(1):336. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03487-0. Neurosurg Rev. 2025. PMID: 40153085 Review.
Cited by
-
Machine learning-based prediction of mortality in pediatric trauma patients.Front Pediatr. 2025 Feb 27;13:1522845. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1522845. eCollection 2025. Front Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 40083437 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials