Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 1;35(1):75-81.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001082.

Anesthesia for tracheal and carinal resection and reconstruction

Affiliations
Review

Anesthesia for tracheal and carinal resection and reconstruction

Mark Schieren et al. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current anesthetic management of tracheal and carinal resection and reconstruction.

Recent findings: In addition to the traditional anesthetic approach using conventional tracheal intubation after induction of general anesthesia and cross-field intubation or jet-ventilation once the airway has been surgically opened, there is a trend toward less invasive anesthetic procedures. Regional anesthetic techniques and approaches focusing on the maintenance of spontaneous respiration have emerged. Especially for cervical tracheal stenosis, laryngeal mask airways appear to be an advantageous alternative to tracheal intubation.Extracorporeal support can ensure adequate gas exchange and/or perfusion during complex resections and reconstructions without interference of airway devices with the operative field. It also serves as an effective rescue technique in case other approaches fail.

Summary: The spectrum of available anesthetic techniques for major airway surgery is immense. To find the safest approach for the individual patient, comprehensive interdisciplinary planning is essential. The location and anatomic consistency of the stenosis, comorbidities, the functional status of respiratory system, as well as the planned reconstructive technique need to be considered. Until more data is available, however, a reliable evidence-based comparison of different approaches is not possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schieren M, Böhmer A, Dusse F, et al. New approaches to airway management in tracheal resections-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:1351–1358.
    1. Liang H, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Zhou Y, et al. Nonintubated anesthesia for tracheal/carinal resection and reconstruction. Thorac Surg Clin 2020; 30:83–90.
    1. Akopov A, Kovalev M. Nonintubated tracheal surgery. Thorac Surg Clin 2020; 30:91–99.
    1. Okuda K, Nakanishi R. The nonintubated anesthesia for airway surgery. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8:3414–3419.
    1. Simon M, Gottschall R, Gugel M, et al. Comparison of transcutaneous and endtidal CO 2 -monitoring for rigid bronchoscopy during high-frequency jet ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47:861–867.