The histologic phenotype of lung cancers is associated with transcriptomic features rather than genomic characteristics
- PMID: 34873156
- PMCID: PMC8648877
- DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27341-1
The histologic phenotype of lung cancers is associated with transcriptomic features rather than genomic characteristics
Abstract
Histology plays an essential role in therapeutic decision-making for lung cancer patients. However, the molecular determinants of lung cancer histology are largely unknown. We conduct whole-exome sequencing and microarray profiling on 19 micro-dissected tumor regions of different histologic subtypes from 9 patients with lung cancers of mixed histology. A median of 68.9% of point mutations and 83% of copy number aberrations are shared between different histologic components within the same tumors. Furthermore, different histologic components within the tumors demonstrate similar subclonal architecture. On the other hand, transcriptomic profiling reveals shared pathways between the same histologic subtypes from different patients, which is supported by the analyses of the transcriptomic data from 141 cell lines and 343 lung cancers of different histologic subtypes. These data derived from mixed histologic subtypes in the setting of identical genetic background and exposure history support that the histologic fate of lung cancer cells is associated with transcriptomic features rather than the genomic profiles in most tumors.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Jianjun Zhang reports research funding from Merck, Johnson and Johnson, and consultant fees from BMS, Johnson and Johnson, AstraZeneca, Geneplus, OrigMed, Innovent outside the submitted work. J. V. H. reports research funding from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Spectrum; consultant fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Catalyst, EMD Serono, Foundation Medicine, Hengrui Therapeutics, Genentech, GSK, Guardant Health, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Spectrum, and Takeda; licensing fees from Spectrum. B. S. reports consultant fees from BMS. M. V. N. reports research funding from Mirati, Novartis, Checkmate, Ziopharm, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Genentech; consultant fees from Mirati, Merck/MSD. The other authors declare neither financial nor non-financial interests in the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Grilley-Olson JE, et al. Validation of interobserver agreement in lung cancer assessment: hematoxylin-eosin diagnostic reproducibility for non-small cell lung cancer: the 2004 World Health Organization classification and therapeutically relevant subsets. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2013;137:32–40. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0033-OA. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
