Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 29;13(11):e20024.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.20024. eCollection 2021 Nov.

Are There Any Ethnic Differences in the Response to Baricitinib for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Affiliations

Are There Any Ethnic Differences in the Response to Baricitinib for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Wajith Hussain Zahir Hussain et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction Baricitinib is an oral synthetic Janus Kinase inhibitor that inhibits JAK1 and JAK2, and the new kid on the block in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To date, there are no studies comparing the clinical benefit of baricitinib in RA between different ethnicities. Ethnicity plays a role in the effectiveness of therapeutic agents. Given the large multi-ethnic population of Leicestershire in the United Kingdom and the range of new therapeutics in RA, we reviewed our cohort of patients with RA to see whether there is any difference in baricitinib Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) response between the Asian and White cohorts. Methods This was a retrospective study. The patients included were those under the care of rheumatology at University Hospitals of Leicester (UHL) with a diagnosis of RA and either receiving baricitinib or had received it in the past. Data was collected using the UHL information technology systems, clinic letters and pharmacy records. In addition to ethnicity, we reviewed patient age, gender, concurrent disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) used, previous biologics used, baseline and post-treatment DAS28, dropout from therapy, baseline biochemical assays (anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) and rheumatoid factor (RF) status) and radiographic findings. An independent t-test was used to compare continuous data, and Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare categorical data. Results A total of 120 patients were included in the analysis, and data were analysed with Portable Format for Analytics (PFA). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean DAS28 at baseline (Asian: 5.17 versus White: 4.65; p-value = 0.107) and post-treatment (Asian: 2.8 versus White: 3.3; p-value = 0.404). Comparing both ethnicities, there was no statistically significant difference in previous biologics used, anti-CCP and RF titres, and radiographic findings of erosions. Conclusion This is the first study of its kind, and it found no significant difference in baricitinib response between the Asian and White cohorts. Our study had certain limitations, and future studies will be needed to evaluate this subject further. Such data is important as it can contribute to a body of evidence that may in the future help inform clinical decision-making.

Keywords: baricitinib; drug response; ethnicity; jak inhibitors; rheumatoid arthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Method of statistical comparison
RA = rheumatoid arthritis n = number DAS28 = Disease Activity Score 28 DMARDs = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison between mean baseline DAS28 and mean post-treatment DAS28 in ethnicity
Error bars = standard error of the mean DAS28 = Disease Activity Score 28
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison between mean baseline DAS28 and mean post-treatment DAS28 in age
Error bars = standard error of the mean DAS28 = Disease Activity Score 28
Figure 4
Figure 4. Comparison between mean baseline DAS28 and mean post-treatment DAS28 in gender
Error bars = standard error of the mean DAS28 = Disease Activity Score 28
Figure 5
Figure 5. Comparison between mean baseline DAS28 and mean post-treatment DAS28 in previous biologic therapy
Error bars = standard error of the mean DAS28 = Disease Activity Score 28
Figure 6
Figure 6. Comparison between mean baseline DAS28 and mean post-treatment DAS28 in radiographic erosions
Error bars = standard error of the mean DAS28 = Disease Activity Score 28

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baricitinib inhibits structural joint damage progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-a comprehensive review. Emery P, Durez P, Hueber AJ, de la Torre I, Larsson E, Holzkämper T, Tanaka Y. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23:3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baricitinib, methotrexate, or combination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and no or limited prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment. Fleischmann R, Schiff M, van der Heijde D, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:506–517. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:652–662. - PubMed
    1. Safety profile of baricitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with over 2 years median time in treatment. Smolen JS, Genovese MC, Takeuchi T, et al. J Rheumatol. 2019;46:7–18. - PubMed
    1. Tailored first-line biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis. Cantini F, Niccoli L, Nannini C, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;45:519–532. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources