Virus inactivation at moderately low pH varies with virus and buffer properties
- PMID: 34874097
- DOI: 10.1002/biot.202100320
Virus inactivation at moderately low pH varies with virus and buffer properties
Abstract
Background: Virus inactivation is a critical operation in therapeutic protein manufacturing. Low pH buffers are a widely used strategy to ensure robust enveloped virus clearance. However, the choice of model virus can give varying results in viral clearance studies. Pseudorabies virus (SuHV) or herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) are frequently chosen as model viruses to demonstrate the inactivation for the herpes family.
Results: In this study, SuHV, HSV-1, and equine arteritis virus (EAV) were used to compare the inactivation susceptibility at pH 4.0 and 4°C. SuHV and HSV-1 are from the same family, and EAV was chosen as a small, enveloped virus. Glycine, acetate, and citrate buffers at pH 4.0 and varying buffer strengths were studied. The inactivation susceptibility was found to be in the order of SuHV > HSV > EAV. The buffer effectiveness was found to be in the order of citrate > acetate > glycine. The smaller virus, EAV, remained stable and infectious in all the buffer types and compositions studied.
Conclusion: The variation in inactivation susceptibility of herpes viruses indicated that SuHV and HSV cannot be interchangeably used as a virus model for inactivation studies. Smaller viruses might remain adventitiously infective at moderately low pH.
Keywords: arteritis virus; bioprocessing; enveloped virus; herpesvirus; viral clearance.
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Barone, P. W., Wiebe, M. E., Leung, J. C., Hussein, I. T. M., Keumurian, F. J., Bouressa, J., Brussel, A., Chen, D., Chong, M., Dehghani, H., Gerentes, L., Gilbert, J., Gold, D., Kiss, R., Kreil, T. R., Labatut, R., Li, Y., Mullberg, J., Mallet, L., … Springs, S. L. (2020). Viral contamination in biologic manufacture and implications for emerging therapies. Nature Biotechnology, 38(5), 563-572.
-
- Johnson, S. A., Brown, M. R., Lute, S. C., & Brorson, K. A. (2017). Adapting viral safety assurance strategies to continuous processing of biological products. Biotechnology Bioeng, 114(1), 21-32.
-
- Liu, H. F., Ma, J., Winter, C., & Bayer, R. (2010). Recovery and purification process development for monoclonal antibody production. mAbs, 2(5), 480-99.
-
- Chinniah, S., Hinckley, P., & Connell-Crowley, L. (2016). Characterization of operating parameters for XMuLV inactivation by low pH treatment. Biotechnology Progress, 32(1), 89-97.
-
- Ma, J., & Roush, D. (2016). Session 1.1: Viral Clearance Using Traditional, Well-Understood Unit Operations: Low pH and Detergent Viral Inactivation. Pda Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, 70(5), 410-416.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
