Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Dec 6;9(12):e28242.
doi: 10.2196/28242.

Impact of a Mobile Telerehabilitation Solution on Metabolic Health Outcomes and Rehabilitation Adherence in Patients With Obesity: Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of a Mobile Telerehabilitation Solution on Metabolic Health Outcomes and Rehabilitation Adherence in Patients With Obesity: Randomized Controlled Trial

François Bughin et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a major public health issue. Combining exercise training, nutrition, and therapeutic education in metabolic rehabilitation (MR) is recommended for obesity management. However, evidence from randomized controlled studies is lacking. In addition, MR is associated with poor patient adherence. Mobile health devices improve access to MR components.

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the changes in body composition, anthropometric parameters, exercise capacity, and quality of life (QOL) within 12 weeks of patients in the telerehabilitation (TR) program to those of usual care patients with obesity.

Methods: This was a parallel-design randomized controlled study. In total, 50 patients with obesity (BMI>30 kg/m²) were included in a TR group (TRG) or a usual care group (UCG) for 12 weeks. Patients underwent biometric impedance analyses, metabolic exercise tests, actimetry, and QOL and satisfaction questionnaires. The primary outcome was the change in fat mass at 12 weeks from baseline. Secondary outcomes were changes in body weight, metabolic parameters, exercise capacity, QOL, patients' adhesion, and satisfaction.

Results: A total of 49 patients completed the study. No significant group × time interaction was found for fat mass (TRG: mean 1.7 kg, SD 2.6 kg; UCG: mean 1.2 kg, SD 2.4 kg; P=.48). Compared with the UCG, TRG patients tended to significantly improve their waist to hip ratios (TRG: -0.01 kg, SD 0.04; UCG: +0.01 kg, SD 0.06; P=.07) and improved QOL physical impact (TRG: +21.8, SD 43.6; UCG: -1.2, SD 15.4; P=.005). Significant time effects were observed for body composition, 6-minute walk test distance, exercise metabolism, sedentary time, and QOL. Adherence (95%) and satisfaction in the TRG were good.

Conclusions: In adults with obesity, the TR program was not superior to usual care for improving body composition. However, TR was able to deliver full multidisciplinary rehabilitation to patients with obesity and improve some health outcomes. Given the patients' adherence and satisfaction, pragmatic programs should consider mobile health devices to improve access to MR. Further studies are warranted to further establish the benefits that TR has over usual care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03396666; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03396666.

Keywords: mHealth; mobile phone; obesity; rehabilitation; telerehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Telerehabilitation mobile app.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Telerehabilitation website.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study participant flowchart.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relative change in fat mass after 12 weeks. TRG: telerehabilitation group; UCG: usual care group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Waist to hip ratio change after 12 weeks (absolute). TRG: telerehabilitation group; UCG: usual care group.
Figure 6
Figure 6
EQVOD scale scores for physical impact changes after 12 weeks (absolute). EQVOD: echelle qualité de vie, obésité et diététique; TRG: telerehabilitation group; UCG: usual care group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2627–42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(17)32129-3 S0140-6736(17)32129-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Global BMI Mortality Collaboration. Di Angelantonio E, Bhupathiraju S, Wormser D, Gao P, Kaptoge S, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Cairns B, Huxley R, Jackson C, Joshy G, Lewington S, Manson J, Murphy N, Patel A, Samet J, Woodward M, Zheng W, Zhou M, Bansal N, Barricarte A, Carter B, Cerhan J, Smith G, Fang X, Franco O, Green J, Halsey J, Hildebrand J, Jung K, Korda R, McLerran D, Moore S, O'Keeffe L, Paige E, Ramond A, Reeves G, Rolland B, Sacerdote C, Sattar N, Sofianopoulou E, Stevens J, Thun M, Ueshima H, Yang L, Yun Y, Willeit P, Banks E, Beral V, Chen Z, Gapstur S, Gunter M, Hartge P, Jee S, Lam T, Peto R, Potter J, Willett W, Thompson S, Danesh J, Hu F. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet. 2016 Dec 20;388(10046):776–86. doi: 10.1016/S01406736(16)30175-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30175-1.S0140-6736(16)30175-1 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Després J. Body fat distribution and risk of cardiovascular disease: an update. Circulation. 2012 Sep 04;126(10):1301–13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.067264.126/10/1301 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pouliot MC, Després JP, Lemieux S, Moorjani S, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Lupien PJ. Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Mar 01;73(7):460–8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90676-9.0002-9149(94)90676-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kissebah AH, Vydelingum N, Murray R, Evans DJ, Hartz AJ, Kalkhoff RK, Adams PW. Relation of body fat distribution to metabolic complications of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1982 Feb;54(2):254–60. doi: 10.1210/jcem-54-2-254. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data